PEP 784: Mark as Accepted #4387
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
As requested by the Steering Council
AA-Turner
approved these changes
Apr 26, 2025
|
(adding the label as this PR requires governance approval) |
warsaw
reviewed
Apr 26, 2025
warsaw
approved these changes
Apr 26, 2025
Co-authored-by: Barry Warsaw <barry@python.org>
AA-Turner
reviewed
Apr 26, 2025
Co-authored-by: Adam Turner <9087854+AA-Turner@users.noreply.github.com>
gpshead
approved these changes
Apr 26, 2025
pablogsal
approved these changes
Apr 26, 2025
Co-authored-by: "Gregory P. Smith" <greg@krypto.org>
gpshead
approved these changes
Apr 26, 2025
gpshead
approved these changes
Apr 29, 2025
corona10
reviewed
Apr 29, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Discussions-TothreadPEP 123: Mark as Accepted)Statuschanged toAccepted/RejectedResolutionfield points directly to SC/PEP Delegate official acceptance/rejected post, including the date (e.g.`01-Jan-2000 <https://discuss.python.org/t/12345/100>`__)Discussions-To,Post-HistoryandPython-Versionup to dateI removed any references to removal or deprecation of the existing modules other than to say that it is left to a future decision as part of the Backwards Compatibility section.
At the behest of Barry, cc'ing @python/steering-council to review the exact language.
📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://pep-previews--4387.org.readthedocs.build/