Skip to content

Traducido faq/design #479

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jul 10, 2020
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Prev Previous commit
Next Next commit
Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: narvmtz <51009725+narvmtz@users.noreply.github.com>
  • Loading branch information
cmaureir and narvmtz authored Jul 9, 2020
commit 62383eed6a28ca421fc91ef06ace1d8eb8ed1342
3 changes: 1 addition & 2 deletions dict
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -35,7 +35,6 @@ Asincrónicamente
asincrónicas
auditoría
Autocompletado
autoreferenciales
autocomprobación
Aqua
auxiliar
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -999,4 +998,4 @@ reentrantes
rastrearlo
readquirir
Dijkstra
Edsger
Edsger
8 changes: 4 additions & 4 deletions faq/design.po
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -416,7 +416,7 @@ msgid ""
"on names bound to strings there is no logical reason to make them "
"unavailable on literals."
msgstr ""
"El primero corre a lo largo de las líneas de: \"Se ve realmente feo el uso de"
"El primero corre a lo largo de las líneas de: \"Se ve realmente feo el uso de "
"un método de un literal de cadena (constante de cadena)\", a lo que la "
"respuesta es que sí, pero un literal de cadena es solo un valor fijo. Si se "
"permiten los métodos en nombres vinculados a cadenas, no hay razón lógica "
Expand All @@ -429,9 +429,9 @@ msgid ""
"For some reason there seems to be much less difficulty with having :meth:"
"`~str.split` as a string method, since in that case it is easy to see that ::"
msgstr ""
"La segunda objeción generalmente se presenta como: \"Realmente estoy "
"diciendo una secuencia para unir a sus miembros con una constante de cadena"
"\". Lamentablemente, no lo eres. Por alguna razón, parece ser mucho menos "
"La segunda objeción generalmente se presenta como: \"Realmente estoy diciéndole "
"a una secuencia que una a sus miembros junto con una constante de cadena"
"\". Lamentablemente, no lo estas haciendo. Por alguna razón, parece ser mucho menos "
"difícil tener :meth:`~str.split` como método de cadena, ya que en ese caso "
"es fácil ver que::"

Expand Down