Skip to content

Response Functions as Member Functions? #1084

Closed
@lkies

Description

@lkies

Hi,
are there some ideological reasons why the response functions are not available as member functions for the respective system classes like they are in sicpy.signal? I feel like this would make the library a bit nicer to use.
I am willing to implement this myself, I just want to ensure that it would actually have a change of getting merged before putting in the effort.
Just to be clear, I mean forwarding the calls or aliasing the methods, not refactoring the code.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions