Skip to content

Change installation instructions to recommend Conda, warn about compiling Slycot #850

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
roryyorke opened this issue Jan 21, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #880
Closed

Change installation instructions to recommend Conda, warn about compiling Slycot #850

roryyorke opened this issue Jan 21, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #880
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@roryyorke
Copy link
Contributor

See python-control/Slycot#191

The python-control installation docs should recommend conda first, and, when suggesting pip install slycot, warning that compilation can be difficult, especially on Windows.

Tangentially, on the conda instructions: is it safe to install numpy & scipy from the conda default repos, and slycot from conda-forge? See, e.g., the somewhat old conda/conda#7273 (comment) which says that one should not mix these (though requests for a reference for that go unanswered.) FWIW, I nowadays use mambaforge , which defaults to conda-forge, and seems to generally work well on Windows and Linux.

@murrayrm murrayrm added this to the 0.9.4 milestone Mar 26, 2023
@murrayrm murrayrm self-assigned this Mar 26, 2023
murrayrm added a commit to murrayrm/python-control that referenced this issue Mar 27, 2023
murrayrm added a commit to murrayrm/python-control that referenced this issue Mar 27, 2023
murrayrm added a commit to murrayrm/python-control that referenced this issue Mar 31, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants