Skip to content

skip TF indexing test if no slycot #254

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 22, 2018
Merged

skip TF indexing test if no slycot #254

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 22, 2018

Conversation

murrayrm
Copy link
Member

PR #246 introduced a small unit test bug since it didn't check for presence of slycot before creating a MIMO transfer function. One line fix.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.8%) to 78.762% when pulling fcb2af0 on murrayrm:fix_test_noslycot into b89ed4f on python-control:master.

5 similar comments
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.8%) to 78.762% when pulling fcb2af0 on murrayrm:fix_test_noslycot into b89ed4f on python-control:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.8%) to 78.762% when pulling fcb2af0 on murrayrm:fix_test_noslycot into b89ed4f on python-control:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.8%) to 78.762% when pulling fcb2af0 on murrayrm:fix_test_noslycot into b89ed4f on python-control:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.8%) to 78.762% when pulling fcb2af0 on murrayrm:fix_test_noslycot into b89ed4f on python-control:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.8%) to 78.762% when pulling fcb2af0 on murrayrm:fix_test_noslycot into b89ed4f on python-control:master.

@murrayrm murrayrm merged commit 7e108c1 into python-control:master Dec 22, 2018
@murrayrm murrayrm deleted the fix_test_noslycot branch April 21, 2019 15:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@murrayrm @coveralls