Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixed InterconnectedSystems name bugs. #400
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixed InterconnectedSystems name bugs. #400
Changes from all commits
672f229
15a442a
77f9441
d45a6c0
b688729
c8fba97
bd38dea
35676f2
90705d4
69cc8c5
e76a4f8
abb1f19
f955b3a
3ec2f02
8c957b2
b2c8d44
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@murrayrm This is the part that would break if you add a named signal with a generic 'sys[i]' that will cause a conflict (it's no different from having two systems with the same name). The only "bad" thing that happens is that the system will be missing the state names of the systems with conflicting names (only the first 'sys[i].states' will be present).
Right now we are only raising a warning. As I mention in the comment, users can use sys.copy() first to create a unique name. Is this ok?
Edit: see the comment above this snippet of code... I'm new to this and not sure how to include it in the comment.