Skip to content

remove from readme.rst that you need a fortran compiler #602

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 2, 2021

Conversation

sawyerbfuller
Copy link
Contributor

@sawyerbfuller sawyerbfuller commented Apr 2, 2021

The statement that slycot needs a fortran compiler is likely to scare off many potential users of the library, and it is not correct. Binaries of slycot are now available through conda-forge and other locations, which mean you don't need a fortran compiler.

…ycot

The statement that slycot needs a fortran compiler is likely to scare off many potential users of the library, and it is not correct. Binaries of slycot are now available through conda-forge and other locations, which mean you don't need a fortran compiler.
@sawyerbfuller sawyerbfuller changed the title remove from readme.rst that you need a fortran compiler to install sl… remove from readme.rst that you need a fortran compiler Apr 2, 2021
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 89.448% when pulling 472f2c6 on readme-no-fortran-compiler-needed into 5434318 on master.

@bnavigator bnavigator merged commit ba33a1a into master Apr 2, 2021
@murrayrm murrayrm deleted the readme-no-fortran-compiler-needed branch May 3, 2021 05:22
@murrayrm murrayrm added this to the 0.9.1 milestone Dec 30, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants