Skip to content

chore: add link to Commitizen in Github workflow #2083

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 20, 2022
Merged

chore: add link to Commitizen in Github workflow #2083

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 20, 2022

Conversation

JohnVillalovos
Copy link
Member

Add a link to the Commitizen website in the Github workflow. Hopefully
this will help people when their job fails.

Add a link to the Commitizen website in the Github workflow. Hopefully
this will help people when their job fails.
@nejch
Copy link
Member

nejch commented Jun 20, 2022

My suspicion based on previous PRs is that unfortunately not 🤣 but this definitely won't hurt, thanks @JohnVillalovos!

@nejch nejch merged commit 8342f53 into main Jun 20, 2022
@nejch nejch deleted the jlvillal/cz branch June 20, 2022 21:10
@JohnVillalovos
Copy link
Member Author

My suspicion based on previous PRs is that unfortunately not 🤣 but this definitely won't hurt, thanks @JohnVillalovos!

I have an idea about that but need to think more

@nejch
Copy link
Member

nejch commented Jun 20, 2022

My suspicion based on previous PRs is that unfortunately not rofl but this definitely won't hurt, thanks @JohnVillalovos!

I have an idea about that but need to think more

IMO it'd be easiest with a pre-written bot to comment on the PRs on failure. I'm sure there are already some out there, on GitLab they use https://danger.systems/python/ and https://www.rubydoc.info/gems/gitlab-triage, there's also https://github.com/reviewdog/reviewdog though.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants