Skip to content

fix: support int for parent_id in import_group #2507

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 12, 2023
Merged

Conversation

JohnVillalovos
Copy link
Member

This will also fix other use cases where an integer is passed in to
MultipartEncoder.

Added unit tests to show it works.

Closes: #2506

@JohnVillalovos JohnVillalovos requested a review from nejch March 4, 2023 22:34
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Mar 4, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #2507 (a41539c) into main (d387d91) will increase coverage by 8.58%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2507      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   87.59%   96.17%   +8.58%     
==========================================
  Files          87       87              
  Lines        5665     5676      +11     
==========================================
+ Hits         4962     5459     +497     
+ Misses        703      217     -486     
Flag Coverage Δ
api_func_v4 82.48% <85.00%> (?)
cli_func_v4 82.96% <75.00%> (?)
unit 87.63% <100.00%> (+0.04%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
gitlab/_backends/requests_backend.py 98.36% <100.00%> (+2.36%) ⬆️
gitlab/client.py 98.79% <100.00%> (+4.83%) ⬆️
gitlab/v4/objects/groups.py 90.81% <100.00%> (+7.02%) ⬆️

... and 43 files with indirect coverage changes

Copy link
Member

@nejch nejch left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @JohnVillalovos, just a quick initial question on the fix, the rest seems to me an unrelated refactor so I'll look at it a bit later as I'm a bit tired right now 😅

@JohnVillalovos JohnVillalovos requested a review from nejch March 5, 2023 02:24
@nejch
Copy link
Member

nejch commented Mar 10, 2023

Sorry for the delay here, I just realized the testing conflicts a bit with those added in https://github.com/python-gitlab/python-gitlab/pull/2488/files#diff-fc2667e8a1b0a974c8447eee8fca931262283245469f31693874cad25651c8f1, I'll get back to this on the weekend :)

Copy link
Member

@nejch nejch left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @JohnVillalovos, I had some thoughts on the testing structure but will do a follow-up as we have a big mix now from older tests anyway.

I found the tuple of three values confusing. So instead use a
dataclass to return the three values. It is still confusing but a
little bit less so.

Also add some unit tests
This will also fix other use cases where an integer is passed in to
MultipartEncoder.

Added unit tests to show it works.

Closes: #2506
@nejch nejch force-pushed the jlvillal/parent_int branch from 192475a to a41539c Compare March 12, 2023 09:22
@nejch nejch merged commit 90f96ac into main Mar 12, 2023
@nejch nejch deleted the jlvillal/parent_int branch March 12, 2023 10:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Group import fails when parent_id is passed as int
3 participants