Skip to content

Update fundamentals.rst #397

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 7, 2023
Merged

Conversation

SultanOrazbayev
Copy link
Member

@SultanOrazbayev SultanOrazbayev commented Mar 7, 2023

Resolve #396

Checked with grep -rai '::/' and seems this is the only case.

@eriknw
Copy link
Member

eriknw commented Mar 7, 2023

Thanks for the quick fix @SultanOrazbayev!

I just fixed the (unrelated) bug, which was a new DeprecationWarning, so can you merge the latest main branch into this PR?

@SultanOrazbayev
Copy link
Member Author

Unrelated to the issue/PR, but is it feasible/logical to ignore code tests on the update of docs only?

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage: 99.494% (-0.004%) from 99.498% when pulling 4151c88 on SultanOrazbayev:patch-5 into 360bfe3 on python-graphblas:main.

@eriknw
Copy link
Member

eriknw commented Mar 7, 2023

Unrelated to the issue/PR, but is it feasible/logical to ignore code tests on the update of docs only?

Yeah, that probably a good idea and doable. Want to give it a try? This might be a good resource:
https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/workflow-syntax-for-github-actions#onpushpull_requestpull_request_targetpathspaths-ignore

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[pyos] Broken link in docs
3 participants