Skip to content

[RELICENCE] Adopt the MIT licence for future contributions to python-ldap #417

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jul 1, 2021

Conversation

encukou
Copy link
Member

@encukou encukou commented Jun 29, 2021

  • Add LICENCE.MIT for all contributions from July 2021 onward
  • Explain the licencing situation
  • Start a list of people who agree to relicence their past contributions to MIT

Addresses: #233

If you can and want to make your past contributions to python-ldap available under the MIT licence, please comment on this PR (with "Add me to the list" or "MIT is OK for my contributions").

I'm looking for the following people:

Feel free to Unsubscribe from the issue once your position is known. Thanks for your time!

- Add LICENCE.MIT for all contributions from July 2021 onward
- Explain the licencing situation
- Start a list of people who agree to relicence their past contributions
  to MIT

Addresses: python-ldap#233
@azmeuk
Copy link
Contributor

azmeuk commented Jun 29, 2021

👍

edit: Add me to the list!

@encukou encukou mentioned this pull request Jun 29, 2021
@eyalch
Copy link

eyalch commented Jun 29, 2021

MIT is OK for my conrtibutions

@encukou
Copy link
Member Author

encukou commented Jun 29, 2021

Please say something like "Add me to the list" or "MIT is OK for my contributions" – a thumbs-up might only mean "I've read this".
Thanks!

@pdpotter
Copy link

MIT is OK for my contributions

@rbarrois
Copy link

MIT is OK for my contributions.

Also, from the git log, Alexandre Figura is @arugifa ;)

@rkuska
Copy link

rkuska commented Jun 29, 2021 via email

@johnthagen
Copy link
Contributor

MIT is OK for my contributions.


I also found it a little funny that my only contribution to python-ldap was making sure the LICENSE file was included in the published distributions 😆 : 7196171

@iv-m
Copy link
Contributor

iv-m commented Jun 29, 2021

MIT is OK for my contributions.

1 similar comment
@trolando
Copy link

trolando commented Jun 29, 2021

MIT is OK for my contributions.

@JonathonReinhart
Copy link
Contributor

JonathonReinhart commented Jun 29, 2021

MIT is okay for my contributions.

Thanks for tackling this, @encukou.

@hroncok
Copy link
Contributor

hroncok commented Jun 29, 2021

MIT is OK for my contributions

@peuter
Copy link

peuter commented Jun 29, 2021

MIT is OK for my contributions.

@jdufresne
Copy link
Member

jdufresne commented Jun 29, 2021

MIT is OK for my contributions

@bmwiedemann
Copy link
Contributor

MIT is OK for my contributions.

@MartinBasti
Copy link

MIT is OK for my contributions.

@intgr
Copy link
Contributor

intgr commented Jun 29, 2021

MIT license is okay for my contributions.

@fredthomsen
Copy link
Contributor

MIT is OK for my contributions

@akkornel
Copy link

MIT is OK for my contributions.

@moreati
Copy link

moreati commented Jun 29, 2021

MIT is OK for my contributions

4 similar comments
@aaugustin
Copy link

MIT is OK for my contributions

@Firstyear
Copy link
Contributor

MIT is OK for my contributions

@stlaz
Copy link

stlaz commented Jun 30, 2021

MIT is OK for my contributions

@bbaetz
Copy link

bbaetz commented Jun 30, 2021

MIT is OK for my contributions

@encukou
Copy link
Member Author

encukou commented Jul 1, 2021

Thank you, everyone!
I'll merge this now.
If anyone is still missing and wants to be on the list, comment here or send a PR.

@encukou encukou merged commit 9f9bc4c into python-ldap:master Jul 1, 2021
@encukou encukou deleted the relicence branch July 1, 2021 13:40
@spaceone
Copy link
Contributor

spaceone commented Jul 9, 2021

MIT is OK for my contributions.

@stroeder
Copy link

stroeder commented Jul 9, 2021

Personally I'd strongly prefer re-licensing under Apache-2.0 license to avoid yet another ambigous trap.

@darkrain42
Copy link

MIT is OK for my contributions.

1 similar comment
@hanwentao
Copy link

MIT is OK for my contributions.

encukou added a commit to encukou/python-ldap that referenced this pull request Sep 17, 2021
@encukou
Copy link
Member Author

encukou commented Sep 17, 2021

MIT was a lawyer's suggestion, so I went with it.
There is no ambiguity: this commit adds a file with the exact licence and README refers to that file.

@droideck
Copy link
Contributor

MIT is OK for my contributions.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.