Refactor Bot persistence #1994
Merged
Refactor Bot persistence #1994
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
2a9a5b0 to
1fdc197
Compare
Poolitzer
reviewed
Jun 28, 2020
|
py3.7 fail unrelated and codacy has problems with the v13 branch (we'll see any problems in #1982, though). Merging. |
Bibo-Joshi
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 14, 2020
* Refactor persistence of bots * User BP.set_bot in Dispatcher * Temporarily enable tests for the v13 branch * Add documentation
Bibo-Joshi
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 19, 2020
* Refactor persistence of bots * User BP.set_bot in Dispatcher * Temporarily enable tests for the v13 branch * Add documentation
Bibo-Joshi
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 19, 2020
* Refactor handling of `default_quote` * Make it a breaking change * Pickle a bots defaults * Temporarily enable tests for the v13 branch * Temporarily enable tests for the v13 branch * Refactor handling of kwargs in Bot methods (#1924) * Unify kwargs handling in Bot methods * Remove Request.get, make api_kwargs an explicit argument, move note to head of Bot class * Fix test_official * Update get_file methods * Refactor JobQueue (#1981) * First go on refactoring JobQueue * Temporarily enable tests for the v13 branch * Work on tests * Temporarily enable tests for the v13 branch * Increase coverage * Remove JobQueue.tick() # Was intended for interal use anyways # Fixes tests * Address review * Temporarily enable tests for the v13 branch * Address review * Dispatch errors * Fix handling of job_kwargs * Remove possibility to pass a Bot to JobQueue * Refactor persistence of Bot instances (#1994) * Refactor persistence of bots * User BP.set_bot in Dispatcher * Temporarily enable tests for the v13 branch * Add documentation * Add warning to Updater for passing both defaults and bot * Address review * Fix test
Bibo-Joshi
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 13, 2020
* Refactor persistence of bots * User BP.set_bot in Dispatcher * Temporarily enable tests for the v13 branch * Add documentation
Bibo-Joshi
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 13, 2020
* Refactor handling of `default_quote` * Make it a breaking change * Pickle a bots defaults * Temporarily enable tests for the v13 branch * Temporarily enable tests for the v13 branch * Refactor handling of kwargs in Bot methods (#1924) * Unify kwargs handling in Bot methods * Remove Request.get, make api_kwargs an explicit argument, move note to head of Bot class * Fix test_official * Update get_file methods * Refactor JobQueue (#1981) * First go on refactoring JobQueue * Temporarily enable tests for the v13 branch * Work on tests * Temporarily enable tests for the v13 branch * Increase coverage * Remove JobQueue.tick() # Was intended for interal use anyways # Fixes tests * Address review * Temporarily enable tests for the v13 branch * Address review * Dispatch errors * Fix handling of job_kwargs * Remove possibility to pass a Bot to JobQueue * Refactor persistence of Bot instances (#1994) * Refactor persistence of bots * User BP.set_bot in Dispatcher * Temporarily enable tests for the v13 branch * Add documentation * Add warning to Updater for passing both defaults and bot * Address review * Fix test
Bibo-Joshi
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 16, 2020
* Refactor persistence of bots * User BP.set_bot in Dispatcher * Temporarily enable tests for the v13 branch * Add documentation
Bibo-Joshi
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 16, 2020
* Refactor handling of `default_quote` * Make it a breaking change * Pickle a bots defaults * Temporarily enable tests for the v13 branch * Temporarily enable tests for the v13 branch * Refactor handling of kwargs in Bot methods (#1924) * Unify kwargs handling in Bot methods * Remove Request.get, make api_kwargs an explicit argument, move note to head of Bot class * Fix test_official * Update get_file methods * Refactor JobQueue (#1981) * First go on refactoring JobQueue * Temporarily enable tests for the v13 branch * Work on tests * Temporarily enable tests for the v13 branch * Increase coverage * Remove JobQueue.tick() # Was intended for interal use anyways # Fixes tests * Address review * Temporarily enable tests for the v13 branch * Address review * Dispatch errors * Fix handling of job_kwargs * Remove possibility to pass a Bot to JobQueue * Refactor persistence of Bot instances (#1994) * Refactor persistence of bots * User BP.set_bot in Dispatcher * Temporarily enable tests for the v13 branch * Add documentation * Add warning to Updater for passing both defaults and bot * Address review * Fix test
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #1992
I went for the
__new__approach, but that's up for discussion.Handling arbitrary collections that may contain bots is really not easy. For example, how would one replace a non-mutable
Mappingsubclass that contains a bot with an corresponding object, where the bot is replaced, if one does not know how it was initialized? Therefore I'm currently only handling the built-in types ((default)dict,list,tuple,(frozen)set). IMO that should suffice, as the more important use case is a bot as ordinary attribute (which is far easier to handle via__dict__and__slots__). Still, we'll need a proper documentation for that, if that's approved.