Skip to content

Ensure that param-array matching works correctly #1304

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 10, 2020

Conversation

filmor
Copy link
Member

@filmor filmor commented Dec 3, 2020

What does this implement/fix? Explain your changes.

The previous matching code wasn't specific enough for param arrays, the count of parameters has to be exactly right.

Does this close any currently open issues?

#1302

Any other comments?

Checklist

Check all those that are applicable and complete.

  • Make sure to include one or more tests for your change
  • If an enhancement PR, please create docs and at best an example
  • Add yourself to AUTHORS
  • Updated the CHANGELOG

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Dec 3, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #1304 (13871f2) into master (f8c27a1) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1304   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   74.04%   74.04%           
=======================================
  Files           1        1           
  Lines         289      289           
=======================================
  Hits          214      214           
  Misses         75       75           
Flag Coverage Δ
setup_windows 74.04% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.


Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update f8c27a1...13871f2. Read the comment docs.

@lostmsu
Copy link
Member

lostmsu commented Dec 3, 2020

Can you add a test with a mix of keyword and params array arguments?

@filmor
Copy link
Member Author

filmor commented Dec 4, 2020

I added some more tests, but three of them are failing. I commented them out for now and will try to fix them today.

Copy link
Member

@lostmsu lostmsu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please, remove the commented out code first.

We can match n Python parameters to exactly n+1 C# parameters of which
the last one is a param-array.

Fixes pythonnet#1302.
@filmor filmor merged commit 4133927 into pythonnet:master Dec 10, 2020
@filmor filmor deleted the fix-params-index branch December 10, 2020 17:47
@christabella christabella mentioned this pull request Dec 17, 2020
4 tasks
@@ -652,7 +652,7 @@ static Type TryComputeClrArgumentType(Type parameterType, IntPtr argument, bool
{
match = true;
}
else if (positionalArgumentCount < parameters.Length)
else if (positionalArgumentCount < parameters.Length && (!paramsArray || positionalArgumentCount == parameters.Length - 1))
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe it would be useful to comment explicitly on what kind of cases would fall into this condition, or simplify the branching statements somehow (refactor the default arg logic in a separate method)? Just by reading this I'm guessing that this should take care of only the following 2 cases?

  1. when it's not a params array but there are some default values we need to fill in
  2. when it's a params array and exactly one parameter is missing

Maybe there are more?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nevermind, actually I get it now! I also added an extra comment and renamed the variables for readability and consistency with the others parts of methodbinder in my PR: https://github.com/pythonnet/pythonnet/pull/1324/files#diff-237dc718ad5424f5476d2ebbbc4e5164c95901bd2a4c2daaf8ca6fc9f9d3a5fbR703-R704

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants