Skip to content

higher_order_ops.py unimplemented_v2 migration, part1 #155264

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: gh/zou3519/1175/base
Choose a base branch
from
Open

higher_order_ops.py unimplemented_v2 migration, part1 #155264

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

zou3519
Copy link
Contributor

@zou3519 zou3519 commented Jun 5, 2025 •
edited by pytorch-bot bot
Loading

@zou3519
higher_order_ops.py unimplemented_v2 migration, part1
b960ac2 
There's a lot of unimplemented calls in this file. I'm slowly making my
way through.

[ghstack-poisoned]
@pytorch-bot PyTorch Bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Jun 5, 2025 •
edited
Loading

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/155264

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❗ 1 Merge Blocking SEVs

There is 1 active merge blocking SEVs. Please view them below:

If you must merge, use @pytorchbot merge -f.

❌ 20 New Failures, 6 Unrelated Failures

As of commit b960ac2 with merge base ed661a5 (image):

NEW FAILURES - The following jobs have failed:

FLAKY - The following jobs failed but were likely due to flakiness present on trunk:

BROKEN TRUNK - The following jobs failed but were present on the merge base:

👉 Rebase onto the `viable/strict` branch to avoid these failures

UNSTABLE - The following job is marked as unstable, possibly due to flakiness on trunk:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

zou3519 added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 5, 2025
@zou3519
higher_order_ops.py unimplemented_v2 migration, part1
693a6b9 
There's a lot of unimplemented calls in this file. I'm slowly making my
way through.

ghstack-source-id: 3651907
Pull Request resolved: #155264
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jun 5, 2025

This PR needs a release notes: label

If your changes are user facing and intended to be a part of release notes, please use a label starting with release notes:.

If not, please add the topic: not user facing label.

To add a label, you can comment to pytorchbot, for example
@pytorchbot label "topic: not user facing"

For more information, see
https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/wiki/PyTorch-AutoLabel-Bot#why-categorize-for-release-notes-and-how-does-it-work.

@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Aug 5, 2025

Looks like this PR hasn't been updated in a while so we're going to go ahead and mark this as Stale.
Feel free to remove the Stale label if you feel this was a mistake.
If you are unable to remove the Stale label please contact a maintainer in order to do so.
If you want the bot to never mark this PR stale again, add the no-stale label.
Stale pull requests will automatically be closed after 30 days of inactivity.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Aug 5, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
ciflow/inductor module: dynamo Stale
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@zou3519