[nativert] move execution planner to torch #155374

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Closed

dolpm wants to merge 1 commit into pytorch:main from dolpm:export-D76167093

Contributor

dolpm commented Jun 6, 2025 •

edited by clee2000

Loading

Summary: att

Test Plan:
ci

Rollback Plan:

Differential Revision: D76167093

pytorch-bot bot commented Jun 6, 2025 •

edited

Loading

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/155374

📄 Preview Python docs built from this PR
📄 Preview C++ docs built from this PR
❓ Need help or want to give feedback on the CI? Visit the bot commands wiki or our office hours

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❌ 1 Cancelled Job, 2 Pending, 2 Unrelated Failures

As of commit c1fb126 with merge base b1b8e57 ():

CANCELLED JOB - The following job was cancelled. Please retry:

trunk / verify-cachebench-cpu-build / build (gh)
The runner has received a shutdown signal. This can happen when the runner service is stopped, or a manually started runner is canceled.

FLAKY - The following job failed but was likely due to flakiness present on trunk:

trunk / before-test / target-determination (gh) (similar failure)
The runner has received a shutdown signal. This can happen when the runner service is stopped, or a manually started runner is canceled.

UNSTABLE - The following job is marked as unstable, possibly due to flakiness on trunk:

pull / linux-jammy-py3-clang12-executorch / test (executorch, 1, 1, lf.linux.2xlarge, unstable) (gh)
exir/backend/test/test_to_backend_multi_method.py::TestToBackendMultiMethod::test_multi_method_end_to_end

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

Contributor

facebook-github-bot commented Jun 6, 2025

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D76167093

facebook-github-bot added the fb-exported label

Contributor

facebook-github-bot commented Jun 6, 2025

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D76167093

1 similar comment

Contributor

facebook-github-bot commented Jun 6, 2025

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D76167093

dolpm added a commit to dolpm/pytorch that referenced this pull request


          [nativert] move execution planner to torch (pytorch#155374)

add5617

Summary:
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#155374

att

Test Plan:
ci

Rollback Plan:

Differential Revision: D76167093

dolpm force-pushed the export-D76167093 branch from 5f8e0bf to add5617 Compare

June 6, 2025 22:56

zhxchen17 added the topic: not user facing label

zhxchen17 approved these changes

View reviewed changes

pytorch-bot bot added the ciflow/trunk label

Contributor

facebook-github-bot commented Jun 10, 2025

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D76167093


          [nativert] move execution planner to torch (pytorch#155374)

c1fb126

Summary:
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#155374

att

Test Plan:
ci

Rollback Plan:

Reviewed By: zhxchen17

Differential Revision: D76167093

dolpm force-pushed the export-D76167093 branch from add5617 to c1fb126 Compare

June 10, 2025 18:42

Contributor

facebook-github-bot commented Jun 10, 2025

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D76167093

Contributor

facebook-github-bot commented Jun 10, 2025

@pytorchbot merge -i

(Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally)

pytorchmergebot added the merging label

Collaborator

pytorchmergebot commented Jun 10, 2025

Merge failed

Reason: This PR has internal changes and must be landed via Phabricator! Please try reimporting/rexporting the PR!

Details for Dev Infra team

Raised by workflow job

pytorchmergebot removed the merging label

Contributor

clee2000 commented Jun 10, 2025

@pytorchbot merge -f "im pretty sure this is in sync"

Collaborator

pytorchmergebot commented Jun 10, 2025

Merge started

Your change will be merged immediately since you used the force (-f) flag, bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes). Please use -f as last resort and instead consider -i/--ignore-current to continue the merge ignoring current failures. This will allow currently pending tests to finish and report signal before the merge.

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging

Check the merge workflow status
here

pytorchmergebot added the merging label

pytorchmergebot closed this in

8892b78

pytorchmergebot added Merged and removed merging labels

thatgeeman pushed a commit to thatgeeman/pytorch-docathon that referenced this pull request


          [nativert] move execution planner to torch (pytorch#155374)

e06835f

Summary: att

Test Plan:
ci

Rollback Plan:

Differential Revidsion: D76167093

Pull Request resolved: pytorch#155374
Approved by: https://github.com/zhxchen17

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ciflow/trunk fb-exported Merged topic: not user facing