Skip to content

[vllm hash update] update the pinned vllm hash #159610

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed

Conversation

pytorchupdatebot
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR is auto-generated nightly by this action.
Update the pinned vllm hash.

@pytorchupdatebot pytorchupdatebot requested a review from a team as a code owner August 1, 2025 00:33
@pytorchbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@pytorchbot merge

Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Aug 1, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/159610

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ You can merge normally! (1 Unrelated Failure)

As of commit 249e8a6 with merge base 978e3a9 (image):

UNSTABLE - The following job is marked as unstable, possibly due to flakiness on trunk:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added ciflow/inductor topic: not user facing topic category ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request labels Aug 1, 2025
@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge failed

Reason: 1 mandatory check(s) failed. The first few are:

Dig deeper by viewing the failures on hud

Details for Dev Infra team Raised by workflow job

Failing merge rule: Core Maintainers

@pytorchbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorchupdatebot pytorchupdatebot force-pushed the update-vllm-commit-hash/16663082088-1700-1 branch from 34776b2 to 99c4450 Compare August 2, 2025 00:28
@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge failed

Reason: 1 mandatory check(s) failed. The first few are:

Dig deeper by viewing the failures on hud

Details for Dev Infra team Raised by workflow job

Failing merge rule: Core Maintainers

@pytorchbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorchupdatebot pytorchupdatebot force-pushed the update-vllm-commit-hash/16663082088-1700-1 branch from 99c4450 to 6804b65 Compare August 3, 2025 00:32
@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge failed

Reason: 1 mandatory check(s) failed. The first few are:

Dig deeper by viewing the failures on hud

Details for Dev Infra team Raised by workflow job

Failing merge rule: Core Maintainers

@pytorchbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorchupdatebot pytorchupdatebot force-pushed the update-vllm-commit-hash/16663082088-1700-1 branch from 6804b65 to 249e8a6 Compare August 4, 2025 00:32
@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ciflow/inductor ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request Merged open source topic: not user facing topic category
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants