Skip to content

Implement list(UserDefinedObject) via force_unpack_var_sequence #159864

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: gh/guilhermeleobas/222/base
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

[ghstack-poisoned]
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Aug 5, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/159864

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❗ 1 Active SEVs

There are 1 currently active SEVs. If your PR is affected, please view them below:

✅ You can merge normally! (3 Unrelated Failures)

As of commit 2263016 with merge base aeb5321 (image):

UNSTABLE - The following jobs are marked as unstable, possibly due to flakiness on trunk:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

[ghstack-poisoned]
@guilhermeleobas guilhermeleobas marked this pull request as ready for review August 5, 2025 16:03
@@ -1092,6 +1094,27 @@ def unpack_var_sequence(self, tx):
]
return super().unpack_var_sequence(tx)

def has_force_unpack_var_sequence(self, tx):
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please specify return type as bool

[ghstack-poisoned]
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants