Skip to content

Generalize Block/Pool in device caching allocator #160082

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: gh/guangyey/182/base
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Generalize Block/Pool in device caching allocator #160082

wants to merge 6 commits into from
+513 −0

Conversation

guangyey
Copy link
Collaborator

@guangyey guangyey commented Aug 7, 2025 •
edited
Loading

@pytorch-bot PyTorch Bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Aug 7, 2025 •
edited
Loading

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/160082

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❌ 2 New Failures, 1 Unrelated Failure

As of commit eb9574f with merge base 2507ae6 (image):

NEW FAILURES - The following jobs have failed:

UNSTABLE - The following job is marked as unstable, possibly due to flakiness on trunk:

  • pull / linux-jammy-py3_9-clang9-xla / test (xla, 1, 1, linux.12xlarge, unstable) (gh) (#158876)
    /var/lib/jenkins/workspace/xla/torch_xla/csrc/runtime/BUILD:476:14: Compiling torch_xla/csrc/runtime/xla_util_test.cpp failed: (Exit 1): gcc failed: error executing CppCompile command (from target //torch_xla/csrc/runtime:xla_util_test) /usr/bin/gcc -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -fstack-protector -Wall -Wunused-but-set-parameter -Wno-free-nonheap-object -fno-omit-frame-pointer -g0 -O2 '-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=1' -DNDEBUG -ffunction-sections ... (remaining 229 arguments skipped)

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

This was referenced Aug 7, 2025
Open
Open
guangyey added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 7, 2025
@guangyey
Generalize Block/Pool in device caching allocator
b3fbf96 
ghstack-source-id: 50dd814
Pull Request resolved: #160082
@guangyey guangyey changed the title Generalize Block/Pool in device caching allocator [WIP] Generalize Block/Pool in device caching allocator Aug 7, 2025
guangyey added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 7, 2025
@guangyey
Generalize Block/Pool in device caching allocator
49e120b 
ghstack-source-id: 47573fa
Pull Request resolved: #160082
guangyey added 2 commits August 7, 2025 19:00
@guangyey
Update
7a6a823 
[ghstack-poisoned]
@guangyey
Update
c91d2f1 
[ghstack-poisoned]
guangyey added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 8, 2025
@guangyey
Generalize Block/Pool in device caching allocator
208346e 
ghstack-source-id: 6f72ec6
Pull Request resolved: #160082
guangyey added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 8, 2025
@guangyey
Generalize Block/Pool in device caching allocator
b79b51e 
ghstack-source-id: 3e607b8
Pull Request resolved: #160082
@guangyey guangyey mentioned this pull request Aug 8, 2025
Open
@guangyey
Update
2190391 
[ghstack-poisoned]
@guangyey guangyey changed the title [WIP] Generalize Block/Pool in device caching allocator Generalize Block/Pool in device caching allocator Aug 8, 2025
guangyey added 3 commits August 8, 2025 15:05
@guangyey
Update
4061ffd 
[ghstack-poisoned]
@guangyey
Update
5b0d9b1 
[ghstack-poisoned]
@guangyey
Update
eb9574f 
[ghstack-poisoned]
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
open source
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@guangyey @pytorchbot