Skip to content

Make kernel -> model table more exhaustive #4099

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 12, 2025
Merged

Make kernel -> model table more exhaustive #4099

merged 1 commit into from
May 12, 2025

Conversation

lurch
Copy link
Contributor

@lurch lurch commented May 12, 2025

@lurch lurch requested a review from mudge May 12, 2025 09:53
@learmj
Copy link
Contributor

learmj commented May 12, 2025

https://www.raspberrypi.com/documentation/computers/configuration.html#kernel-files-img doesn't map v7l to pi3,cm3 etc. It's kernel8 which is associated to those devices.

mudge
mudge reviewed May 12, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@mudge mudge left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'll defer to @learmj on the correctness of this change.

@lurch
Copy link
Contributor Author

lurch commented May 12, 2025

https://www.raspberrypi.com/documentation/computers/configuration.html#kernel-files-img doesn't map v7l to pi3,cm3 etc. It's kernel8 which is associated to those devices.

AIUI the BCM2837 in the Pi 3, CM3, Zero 2 W, etc. can either run the 32-bit v7 kernel or the 64-bit v8 kernel?
ping @pelwell as he'll know the definitive answer.

@learmj
Copy link
Contributor

learmj commented May 12, 2025

That's correct as I understand it. I think my typo above hasn't helped what I was trying to convey in my comment. If the table is essentially listing compatibility then the change looks fine to me. Sorry.

@pelwell
Copy link
Contributor

pelwell commented May 12, 2025

@learmj I don't understand your point. What you say is correct, but how is it relevant?

@lurch
Copy link
Contributor Author

lurch commented May 12, 2025

If the table is essentially listing compatibility then the change looks fine to me.

Yes, that's exactly what it is 👍

@lurch lurch merged commit 83be4b3 into develop May 12, 2025
1 check passed
@lurch lurch deleted the lurch-patch-1 branch May 12, 2025 10:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@mudge mudge mudge approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@lurch @learmj @pelwell @mudge