Skip to content

Added info on the two general types of FLOSS licenses, and changed "rest... #160

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 8, 2012
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
21 changes: 18 additions & 3 deletions docs/writing/license.rst
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -6,11 +6,26 @@ Open source.
There are plenty of `open source licenses <http://opensource.org/licenses/alphabetical>`_
available to choose from.

In general, these licenses tend to fall into one of two categories:

1. licenses that focus more on the user's freedom to do with the
software as they please (these are the more-permissive open
source licenses such as the MIT, BSD, & Apache), and

2. licenses that focus more on making sure that the code itself —
including any changes made to it and distributed along with it —
always remains free (these are the less-permissive free software
licenses, for example, the GPL and LGPL).

The latter are less-permissive in the sense that they don't permit
someone to add code to the software and distribute it without also
including the source code for their changes.

To help you choose one for your project, there's a `license chooser <http://three.org/openart/license_chooser/>`_,
use it.


Non-Restrictive
More-Permissive
:::::::::::::::

PSFL
Expand All @@ -34,8 +49,8 @@ Apache
------


Restrictive
:::::::::::
Less-Permissive
:::::::::::::::


LGPL
Expand Down