Skip to content

Revert "refac: replace timeseries query in favor on aggregation que… #7732

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 11, 2025
Merged

Revert "refac: replace timeseries query in favor on aggregation que… #7732

merged 2 commits into from
Aug 11, 2025

Conversation

nishantmonu51
Copy link
Collaborator

…ries from explore (#7590)"

This reverts commit 9269d4f.

INSERT DESCRIPTION HERE

Checklist:

  • Covered by tests
  • Ran it and it works as intended
  • Reviewed the diff before requesting a review
  • Checked for unhandled edge cases
  • Linked the issues it closes
  • Checked if the docs need to be updated. If so, create a separate Linear DOCS issue
  • Intend to cherry-pick into the release branch
  • I'm proud of this work!

@nishantmonu51
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@djbarnwal : This reverts in main branch.

@nishantmonu51 nishantmonu51 requested a review from djbarnwal August 5, 2025 17:22
@djbarnwal djbarnwal merged commit 92dee47 into main Aug 11, 2025
11 checks passed
@djbarnwal djbarnwal deleted the revert-timeseries branch August 11, 2025 12:10
djbarnwal added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 11, 2025
@nishantmonu51 @djbarnwal
Revert "refac: replace timeseries query in favor on aggregation que…
bd23aa4 
…ries from explore (#7590)" (#7732)

This reverts commit 9269d4f.

Co-authored-by: Dhiraj Kumar <sumankumaribarnwal@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@djbarnwal djbarnwal djbarnwal approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@nishantmonu51 @djbarnwal