-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.4k
Properly document aliases in Array. #282
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This changes method names in error messages.
from
to
|
tenderlove
pushed a commit
to tenderlove/ruby
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 24, 2014
Based on a patch by @phiggins [Fixes rubyGH-282] git-svn-id: svn+ssh://ci.ruby-lang.org/ruby/trunk@40430 b2dd03c8-39d4-4d8f-98ff-823fe69b080e
maximecb
referenced
this pull request
in Shopify/ruby
Oct 19, 2021
In an effort to simplify the logic YJIT generates for accessing instance variable, YJIT ensures that a given name-to-index mapping exists at compile time. In the case that the mapping doesn't exist, it was created by using rb_ivar_set() with Qundef on the sample object we see at compile time. This hack isn't fine if the sample object happens to be frozen, in which case YJIT would raise a FrozenError unexpectedly. To deal with this, make a new function that only reserves the mapping but doesn't touch the object. This is rb_obj_ensure_iv_index_mapping(). This new function superceeds the functionality of rb_iv_index_tbl_lookup() so it was removed. Reported by and includes a test case from John Hawthorn <john@hawthorn.email> Fixes: GH-282
noahgibbs
referenced
this pull request
in Shopify/ruby
Oct 20, 2021
In an effort to simplify the logic YJIT generates for accessing instance variable, YJIT ensures that a given name-to-index mapping exists at compile time. In the case that the mapping doesn't exist, it was created by using rb_ivar_set() with Qundef on the sample object we see at compile time. This hack isn't fine if the sample object happens to be frozen, in which case YJIT would raise a FrozenError unexpectedly. To deal with this, make a new function that only reserves the mapping but doesn't touch the object. This is rb_obj_ensure_iv_index_mapping(). This new function superceeds the functionality of rb_iv_index_tbl_lookup() so it was removed. Reported by and includes a test case from John Hawthorn <john@hawthorn.email> Fixes: GH-282
XrXr
referenced
this pull request
in Shopify/ruby
Oct 20, 2021
In an effort to simplify the logic YJIT generates for accessing instance variable, YJIT ensures that a given name-to-index mapping exists at compile time. In the case that the mapping doesn't exist, it was created by using rb_ivar_set() with Qundef on the sample object we see at compile time. This hack isn't fine if the sample object happens to be frozen, in which case YJIT would raise a FrozenError unexpectedly. To deal with this, make a new function that only reserves the mapping but doesn't touch the object. This is rb_obj_ensure_iv_index_mapping(). This new function superceeds the functionality of rb_iv_index_tbl_lookup() so it was removed. Reported by and includes a test case from John Hawthorn <john@hawthorn.email> Fixes: GH-282
XrXr
referenced
this pull request
in Shopify/ruby
Oct 20, 2021
In an effort to simplify the logic YJIT generates for accessing instance variable, YJIT ensures that a given name-to-index mapping exists at compile time. In the case that the mapping doesn't exist, it was created by using rb_ivar_set() with Qundef on the sample object we see at compile time. This hack isn't fine if the sample object happens to be frozen, in which case YJIT would raise a FrozenError unexpectedly. To deal with this, make a new function that only reserves the mapping but doesn't touch the object. This is rb_obj_ensure_iv_index_mapping(). This new function superceeds the functionality of rb_iv_index_tbl_lookup() so it was removed. Reported by and includes a test case from John Hawthorn <john@hawthorn.email> Fixes: GH-282
XrXr
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 20, 2021
In an effort to simplify the logic YJIT generates for accessing instance variable, YJIT ensures that a given name-to-index mapping exists at compile time. In the case that the mapping doesn't exist, it was created by using rb_ivar_set() with Qundef on the sample object we see at compile time. This hack isn't fine if the sample object happens to be frozen, in which case YJIT would raise a FrozenError unexpectedly. To deal with this, make a new function that only reserves the mapping but doesn't touch the object. This is rb_obj_ensure_iv_index_mapping(). This new function superceeds the functionality of rb_iv_index_tbl_lookup() so it was removed. Reported by and includes a test case from John Hawthorn <john@hawthorn.email> Fixes: GH-282
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This patch properly identifies and documents aliased methods in Array. I wasn't sure if there were any conventions around where to put aliases in the C class definition or alphabetization of methods, so hopefully this is acceptable.