Skip to content

ja translation, which parts should be unified with en? #168

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
take opened this issue Jun 2, 2013 · 4 comments
Closed

ja translation, which parts should be unified with en? #168

take opened this issue Jun 2, 2013 · 4 comments
Assignees
@hsbt
Labels
translation

Comments

@take
Copy link
Contributor

take commented Jun 2, 2013

Looks like some pages completely differs from the en version in the ja version.( for example, http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/documentation/ and http://www.ruby-lang.org/ja/documentation/ )

And @stomar assumes that most of the ja content is or has been maintained by core team members directly.

Are there any particular rules for the ja content?( like this page should be the same as en, this should not )

/cc @hsbt

ref: #119 (comment)
@ghost ghost assigned hsbt Jun 2, 2013
@hsbt
Copy link
Member

hsbt commented Jun 2, 2013

@tkhr we don't have particular rules 😓 but ja contents includes some of original contents. I think to merge original content and translation of en contents.

@take
Copy link
Contributor Author

take commented Jun 2, 2013

@hsbt hmmmm i c, so some pages should be translated to english(for example, the core dev page ?).

I guess i'll open an issue for each page :) thx

@take take closed this as completed Jun 2, 2013
@hsbt
Copy link
Member

hsbt commented Jun 2, 2013

If you can't decide these policy, please mention to me 😄

@take
Copy link
Contributor Author

take commented Jun 2, 2013

@hsbt yea i will thx :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@hsbt hsbt

Labels
translation
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@hsbt @take