Skip to content

[MRG+1] Deprecated logistic_regression_path #12821

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 19, 2018

Conversation

NicolasHug
Copy link
Member

@NicolasHug NicolasHug commented Dec 18, 2018

Reference Issues/PRs

Closes #12798

What does this implement/fix? Explain your changes.

This PR deprecates the use of logistic_regression_path and makes it private.

Any other comments?

@agramfort agramfort changed the title [MRG] Deprecated logistic_regression_path [MRG+1] Deprecated logistic_regression_path Dec 19, 2018
@@ -87,6 +87,10 @@ Support for Python 3.4 and below has been officially dropped.
:class:`linear_model.MultiTaskLasso` which were breaking when
``warm_start = True``. :issue:`12360` by :user:`Aakanksha Joshi <joaak>`.

- |API| :func:`linear_model.logistic_regression_path` is deprecated
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think usually we put this into the "deprecation" section that should be below. otherwise lgtm

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are you sure? I see a lot of |API| xxx has been deprecated in every sub-section in 0.20.rst

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

oh sorry I guess we changed that.

@amueller amueller merged commit 55a98ab into scikit-learn:master Dec 19, 2018
adrinjalali pushed a commit to adrinjalali/scikit-learn that referenced this pull request Jan 7, 2019
<!--
Thanks for contributing a pull request! Please ensure you have taken a look at
the contribution guidelines: https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#pull-request-checklist
-->

#### Reference Issues/PRs
<!--
Example: Fixes scikit-learn#1234. See also scikit-learn#3456.
Please use keywords (e.g., Fixes) to create link to the issues or pull requests
you resolved, so that they will automatically be closed when your pull request
is merged. See https://github.com/blog/1506-closing-issues-via-pull-requests
-->

Closes scikit-learn#12798 

#### What does this implement/fix? Explain your changes.

This PR deprecates the use of `logistic_regression_path` and makes it private.

#### Any other comments?


<!--
Please be aware that we are a loose team of volunteers so patience is
necessary; assistance handling other issues is very welcome. We value
all user contributions, no matter how minor they are. If we are slow to
review, either the pull request needs some benchmarking, tinkering,
convincing, etc. or more likely the reviewers are simply busy. In either
case, we ask for your understanding during the review process.
For more information, see our FAQ on this topic:
http://scikit-learn.org/dev/faq.html#why-is-my-pull-request-not-getting-any-attention.

Thanks for contributing!
-->
xhluca pushed a commit to xhluca/scikit-learn that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2019
<!--
Thanks for contributing a pull request! Please ensure you have taken a look at
the contribution guidelines: https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#pull-request-checklist
-->

#### Reference Issues/PRs
<!--
Example: Fixes scikit-learn#1234. See also scikit-learn#3456.
Please use keywords (e.g., Fixes) to create link to the issues or pull requests
you resolved, so that they will automatically be closed when your pull request
is merged. See https://github.com/blog/1506-closing-issues-via-pull-requests
-->

Closes scikit-learn#12798 

#### What does this implement/fix? Explain your changes.

This PR deprecates the use of `logistic_regression_path` and makes it private.

#### Any other comments?


<!--
Please be aware that we are a loose team of volunteers so patience is
necessary; assistance handling other issues is very welcome. We value
all user contributions, no matter how minor they are. If we are slow to
review, either the pull request needs some benchmarking, tinkering,
convincing, etc. or more likely the reviewers are simply busy. In either
case, we ask for your understanding during the review process.
For more information, see our FAQ on this topic:
http://scikit-learn.org/dev/faq.html#why-is-my-pull-request-not-getting-any-attention.

Thanks for contributing!
-->
xhluca pushed a commit to xhluca/scikit-learn that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2019
xhluca pushed a commit to xhluca/scikit-learn that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2019
koenvandevelde pushed a commit to koenvandevelde/scikit-learn that referenced this pull request Jul 12, 2019
<!--
Thanks for contributing a pull request! Please ensure you have taken a look at
the contribution guidelines: https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#pull-request-checklist
-->

#### Reference Issues/PRs
<!--
Example: Fixes scikit-learn#1234. See also scikit-learn#3456.
Please use keywords (e.g., Fixes) to create link to the issues or pull requests
you resolved, so that they will automatically be closed when your pull request
is merged. See https://github.com/blog/1506-closing-issues-via-pull-requests
-->

Closes scikit-learn#12798 

#### What does this implement/fix? Explain your changes.

This PR deprecates the use of `logistic_regression_path` and makes it private.

#### Any other comments?


<!--
Please be aware that we are a loose team of volunteers so patience is
necessary; assistance handling other issues is very welcome. We value
all user contributions, no matter how minor they are. If we are slow to
review, either the pull request needs some benchmarking, tinkering,
convincing, etc. or more likely the reviewers are simply busy. In either
case, we ask for your understanding during the review process.
For more information, see our FAQ on this topic:
http://scikit-learn.org/dev/faq.html#why-is-my-pull-request-not-getting-any-attention.

Thanks for contributing!
-->
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Deprecate use of logistic_regression_path to make it private
3 participants