Skip to content

Update make_scorer docs. Missing information after #9521 PR. #12848

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

alien3211
Copy link

Reference Issues/PRs

What does this implement/fix? Explain your changes.

Any other comments?

@adrinjalali
Copy link
Member

Thanks for the PR @alien3211 , could you please provide some context, and a minimal example explaining why the change is needed?

@qinhanmin2014
Copy link
Member

Thanks @alien3211 I did this without a deprecation cycle because I think it's a bug, but yes, we fail to inform users.

Copy link
Member

@qinhanmin2014 qinhanmin2014 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please try to make your words simpler and clearer, e.g., a array of ground truth (correct) labels probability estimates seems hard to understand.

@@ -424,6 +424,10 @@ def make_scorer(score_func, greater_is_better=True, needs_proba=False,
Whether score_func requires predict_proba to get probability estimates
out of a classifier.

When using the binary classification for the ``score_func function``,
Copy link
Member

@qinhanmin2014 qinhanmin2014 Dec 21, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If needs_proba = True, XXX

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants