Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
[MRG] BUG: add support for non numeric values in MissingIndicator #13046
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[MRG] BUG: add support for non numeric values in MissingIndicator #13046
Changes from all commits
1176d66
00d7cb5
21eff01
42d5b36
507ed3a
eb4765c
d4e7778
7fb7599
ec0ab84
3721a61
f38c8d1
4078baa
a0a99d8
e92eb1f
dd73bab
de9630f
1d8c534
f483247
42ed142
9445eb1
a95b08e
193ed4e
85fe5f6
0b5a96d
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
surely OneHotEncoder, OrdinalEncoder and meta-estimators will belong here too.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we do that in another PR. I think that we should also factorize the input validation as well. It is quite redundant and we could have a common test then.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, it probably belongs in estimator tags... (perhaps post-#8022)