-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25.8k
[MRG] Take sample weights into account in partial dependence computation #13193
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
NicolasHug
merged 20 commits into
scikit-learn:master
from
samronsin:add-sample-weights-gbt-partial-dependency
Apr 5, 2019
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
20 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
bdd5b93
Replace n_node_samples by weighted_n_node_samples in partial dependen…
samronsin 74b1290
Add tests for both no-op and real sample weights
samronsin 4da517e
Improve naming and remove useless comment
samronsin 0017f90
Fix small test issues
samronsin d7edb77
Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn…
samronsin 8bc07ba
Fix test for binary classification
samronsin bef200f
Add test for regressions based on example from initial issue
samronsin 76a8283
Edit whats_new
samronsin e4728c9
79
samronsin bb17660
Simplify test code for regression partial dependence
samronsin 7c32edb
PEP8
samronsin 8e9a86d
Facepalm
samronsin 00372bf
Refer to the public function in whats_new
samronsin de7efa5
Make the sample weight test standalone for further reuse
samronsin fb7aa99
Fix PR number
samronsin a3198c0
Testing with L1 relative distance computed as averages
samronsin 7da3038
Testing element-wise
samronsin 1db7427
Fix and simplify unit test for binary classification
samronsin a9ac018
Clarify functional test
samronsin c599099
Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn…
samronsin File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
IMO this whole
if
should be entirely removed. It's not tested anywhere as far as I can see, and this is not PDP-related (this is just tree related).