-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25.8k
DOC improve random_state docstring random modue #15576
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
DOC improve random_state docstring random modue #15576
Conversation
I'm not convinced that a randomisation utility needs this kind of change.
We need this change where there is an algorithm that incorporates
randomness more subtly.
|
@jnothman, @NicolasHug , I think that @happilyeverafter95 modified this file picking it from the list available in #15222. This list is automatically generated and I'm cleaning it for the next sprints. If you all agree that this file should not be touched I will remove it from the new list, please let us know. Anyway thanks Mandy for your work! And sorry for our late reaction. |
i haven't checked the correctness of the comment, but I don't see why we shouldn't also update private utils like this one |
I agree with both points raised by @jnothman and @NicolasHug. Let's focus on public estimators first. |
@happilyeverafter95 Feel free to pick up any other docstring from the list (which is an estimator). |
Sorry if my comment wasn't clear, but I was suggesting that the PR is IMO relevant and the changes should be considered |
Oh no, it is me that did not read correctly your comment. Sorry about that. Let's reopen and merge |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This can be merged when CIs are green.
Reference Issues/PRs
Addresses part of #15222
What does this implement/fix? Explain your changes.
This PR changes the documentation for
random_choice_csc
by documenting which parts of the algorithm was randomized.Any other comments?