DOC More explicit warnings about the misleading use of impurity-based feature_importances #16382
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rth
approved these changes
Feb 4, 2020
rth
approved these changes
Feb 5, 2020
thomasjpfan
pushed a commit
to thomasjpfan/scikit-learn
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 22, 2020
panpiort8
pushed a commit
to panpiort8/scikit-learn
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 3, 2020
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This builds on top of #16237 to better address #14528.
This PR focused on adding more explicit warnings while not changing the code of the examples.
Updating the examples to rewrite them to use permutation_importance can be done in another PR to be able to quickly merge this one.