Skip to content

DOC Add explanation of n_jobs in gaussian_process/_gpc.py #17716

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jun 25, 2020
Merged

DOC Add explanation of n_jobs in gaussian_process/_gpc.py #17716

merged 1 commit into from Jun 25, 2020

Conversation

ghost
Copy link

@ghost ghost commented Jun 25, 2020

Reference Issues/PRs

See #14228

What does this implement/fix? Explain your changes.

Add documentation for n_jobs in sklearn.gaussian_process.GaussianProcessClassifier.

Any other comments?

Copy link
Member

@ogrisel ogrisel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Thanks @t-kusanagi2 !

@ogrisel ogrisel merged commit 99baa50 into scikit-learn:master Jun 25, 2020
Copy link
Member

@NicolasHug NicolasHug left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the PR,

Comment on lines +551 to +552
The number of jobs to use for the computation: the specified
multiclass problems are computed in parallel.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
The number of jobs to use for the computation: the specified
multiclass problems are computed in parallel.
The number of jobs to use for the computation: in a
multiclass setting, the OVO or OVR problems are computed in parallel.
Ignored for binary classification.

glemaitre pushed a commit to glemaitre/scikit-learn that referenced this pull request Jul 17, 2020
jayzed82 pushed a commit to jayzed82/scikit-learn that referenced this pull request Oct 22, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants