-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25.8k
[MRG] Multi class label documentation #2207
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Multilabel learning with OvR | ||
---------------------------- | ||
Multilabel learning | ||
------------------- | ||
|
||
:class:`OneVsRestClassifier` also supports multilabel classification. | ||
To use this feature, feed the classifier a list of tuples containing |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You can use also a binary indicator format.
I think that a small example would be nice which would basically show how to use that estimator with either of list of tuple or binary indicator format.
Could you add a pointer to LabelBinarizer? |
@@ -7,23 +7,34 @@ Multiclass and multilabel algorithms | |||
|
|||
.. currentmodule:: sklearn.multiclass | |||
|
|||
This module implements multiclass and multilabel learning algorithms: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it say somewhere very high up that you don't need this meta-estimators to do multi-class classification as all classifiers have build-in multiclass support
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Most estimators, I believe.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
all. without exception. if there is an exception, it should be listed below as not supporting multiclass imho.
@schwarty do you intend to finish this before the release? |
@schwarty : we are planning to release during the week end. It would be good if you could address the comments. |
please push so we can review your changes :) |
It should be (almost) ready to merge. |
@schwarty : you should push your changes: we want to merge this guy :) |
Close in favor of #2269. |
Re-organized the documentation, added some real simple examples for the definitions of multiclass and multilabel classification.