Skip to content

Conversation

thomasjpfan
Copy link
Member

Reference Issues/PRs

Towards #21308

What does this implement/fix? Explain your changes.

This PR adds get_feature_names_out to voting classifiers. Note that voting='soft' and flatten_transform=False has no feature names because the transform is 3d.

Copy link
Member

@ogrisel ogrisel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Thanks for the PR!

Co-authored-by: Olivier Grisel <olivier.grisel@ensta.org>
@ogrisel ogrisel added the Quick Review For PRs that are quick to review label Mar 7, 2022
Copy link
Member

@jeremiedbb jeremiedbb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A few nitpicks. LGTM otherwise.

@thomasjpfan thomasjpfan force-pushed the voting_get_feature_names_out branch from 01b91d9 to 9b9d534 Compare March 8, 2022 18:52
@jeremiedbb jeremiedbb merged commit 692225d into scikit-learn:main Mar 8, 2022
@jeremiedbb
Copy link
Member

The last one ! thanks @thomasjpfan !

glemaitre pushed a commit to glemaitre/scikit-learn that referenced this pull request Apr 6, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
module:ensemble Quick Review For PRs that are quick to review
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants