DOC Switch to gender neutral terms for sister function #23003
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
glemaitre
reviewed
Mar 31, 2022
Co-authored-by: Guillaume Lemaitre <g.lemaitre58@gmail.com>
|
Thanks @inclusive-coding-bot |
glemaitre
pushed a commit
to glemaitre/scikit-learn
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 6, 2022
jjerphan
pushed a commit
to jjerphan/scikit-learn
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 29, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hey! We noticed your repository had a few instances of gendered language. We've attempted to make the changes to gender neutral language. These are not always perfect, but we hope they will assist maintainers in finding and fixing issues :)
You can learn more about this project and why gender neutral language matters at inclusivecoding.wixsite.com. If you have feedback for this bot, please provide it here.