-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25.8k
[MRG] Improve readability of outlier detection example. #9973
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[MRG] Improve readability of outlier detection example. #9973
Conversation
85201b6
to
f6cf56c
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Otherwise LGTM
@@ -63,21 +65,23 @@ | |||
contamination=outliers_fraction)} | |||
|
|||
# Compare given classifiers under given settings | |||
xx, yy = np.meshgrid(np.linspace(-7, 7, 100), np.linspace(-7, 7, 100)) | |||
n_inliers = int((1. - outliers_fraction) * n_samples) | |||
xx, yy = np.meshgrid(np.linspace(-7, 7, n_samples / 2), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please use // to ensure an integer
f6cf56c
to
d37168e
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Otherwise LGTM
xx, yy = np.meshgrid(np.linspace(-7, 7, 100), np.linspace(-7, 7, 100)) | ||
n_inliers = int((1. - outliers_fraction) * n_samples) | ||
xx, yy = np.meshgrid(np.linspace(-7, 7, n_samples // 2), | ||
np.linspace(-7, 7, n_samples // 2)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's not clear to me why the precision of the grid should be related to the number of samples.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, thanks - that was just my being confused. I've now introduced a GRID_PRECISION
constant instead.
d37168e
to
5e45d49
Compare
thx @hristog |
…cs/donigian-update-contribution-guidelines * 'master' of github.com:scikit-learn/scikit-learn: (23 commits) fixes scikit-learn#10031: fix attribute name and shape in documentation (scikit-learn#10033) [MRG+1] add changelog entry for fixed and merged PR scikit-learn#10005 issue scikit-learn#9633 (scikit-learn#10025) [MRG] Fix LogisticRegression see also should include LogisticRegressionCV(scikit-learn#9995) (scikit-learn#10022) [MRG + 1] Labels of clustering should start at 0 or -1 if noise (scikit-learn#10015) MAINT Remove redundancy in scikit-learn#9552 (scikit-learn#9573) [MRG+1] correct comparison in GaussianNB for 'priors' (scikit-learn#10005) [MRG + 1] ENH add check_inverse in FunctionTransformer (scikit-learn#9399) [MRG] FIX bug in nested set_params usage (scikit-learn#9999) [MRG+1] Fix LOF and Isolation benchmarks (scikit-learn#9798) [MRG + 1] Fix negative inputs checking in mean_squared_log_error (scikit-learn#9968) DOC Fix typo (scikit-learn#9996) DOC Fix typo: x axis -> y axis (scikit-learn#9985) improve example plot_forest_iris.py (scikit-learn#9989) [MRG+1] Deprecate pooling_func unused parameter in AgglomerativeClustering (scikit-learn#9875) DOC update news DOC Fix three typos in manifold documentation (scikit-learn#9990) DOC add missing dot in docstring DOC Add what's new for 0.19.1 (scikit-learn#9983) Improve readability of outlier detection example. (scikit-learn#9973) DOC: Fixed typo (scikit-learn#9977) ...
What does this implement/fix? Explain your changes.
Improves readability of the outlier detection example.
Any other comments?
PEP8 checks passed successfully.