Skip to content

[MRG] FIX put back nca's tests #143

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

wdevazelhes
Copy link
Member

@wdevazelhes wdevazelhes commented Jan 2, 2019

This PR puts back tests on NCA that were put in #99, but that I deleted unintentionnaly in PR #139

wdevazelhes pushed a commit to wdevazelhes/metric-learn that referenced this pull request Jan 2, 2019
@wdevazelhes
Copy link
Member Author

It should be good to merge now. Basically it is just the same tests that were introduced in #99, but here I just also remove the learning rate deprecation test, and I change the tests to use transformer_ instead of A_

@bellet
Copy link
Member

bellet commented Jan 2, 2019

Thanks, let's merge

@bellet bellet merged commit 8658e06 into scikit-learn-contrib:master Jan 2, 2019
bellet pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 2, 2019
* API: remove num_labeled parameter

* DEP: Add deprecation warnings for num_labels

* MAINT: put deprecation for version 0.5.0

* Revert "MAINT: put deprecation for version 0.5.0"

This reverts commit 8727c44.

* Revert "Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into fix/remove_num_labeled_parameter"

This reverts commit 944bb3e, reversing
changes made to 8727c44.

* Revert "Revert "MAINT: put deprecation for version 0.5.0""

This reverts commit bc1eb32.

* FIX string representation test wrongly merged

* git revert d6bd0d4

* STY fix pep8 errors

* STY: fix docstring indentation

* FIX remove tests from NCA that are dealt with in #143

* FIX remove nca deprecation test because we remove totally learning rate in the merge #139

* FIX update version

* Remove the use of random_subset
@wdevazelhes wdevazelhes deleted the fix/put_back_nca_tests branch January 3, 2019 09:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants