Skip to content

docs(touch): clarify docs for touch() command #1078

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 14, 2022
Merged

Conversation

nfischer
Copy link
Member

No change to logic. This expands on the touch() command documentation
to make it more obvious how to use multiple options, long options, etc.
This also renames a variable in a test case to make the usage more
obvious.

No change to logic. This expands on the `touch()` command documentation
to make it more obvious how to use multiple options, long options, etc.
This also renames a variable in a test case to make the usage more
obvious.
@nfischer nfischer added the docs label Feb 14, 2022
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Feb 14, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #1078 (05fc05d) into master (9a0e5f6) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1078   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.19%   97.19%           
=======================================
  Files          36       36           
  Lines        1354     1354           
=======================================
  Hits         1316     1316           
  Misses         38       38           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/touch.js 100.00% <ø> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 9a0e5f6...05fc05d. Read the comment docs.

@nfischer nfischer merged commit 4b6b17a into master Feb 14, 2022
@nfischer nfischer deleted the doc-touch-command branch February 14, 2022 01:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants