Skip to content

test: add more coverage for globOptions #1164

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 14, 2024
Merged

test: add more coverage for globOptions #1164

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 14, 2024

Conversation

nfischer
Copy link
Member

No change to logic. This adds tests for more config.globOptions values. This aims to cover the options which appear to be supported by both node-glob and fast-glob, however the options have different names in each module. This is a followup to PR #1163.

See https://github.com/mrmlnc/fast-glob?tab=readme-ov-file#compatible-with-node-glob

Issue #828

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 14, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 97.27%. Comparing base (d147829) to head (7a5f9a4).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1164   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.27%   97.27%           
=======================================
  Files          36       36           
  Lines        1360     1360           
=======================================
  Hits         1323     1323           
  Misses         37       37           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

No change to logic. This adds tests for more `config.globOptions`
values. This aims to cover the options which appear to be supported by
both node-glob and fast-glob, however the options have different names
in each module. This is a followup to PR #1163.

See https://github.com/mrmlnc/fast-glob?tab=readme-ov-file#compatible-with-node-glob

Issue #828
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant