Skip to content

Improve R2DBC async cursor #4107

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Improve R2DBC async cursor #4107

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

hfhbd
Copy link
Collaborator

@hfhbd hfhbd commented Apr 25, 2023

Based on #4102

@hfhbd hfhbd changed the base branch from master to derekellis/2023-04-25/async-cursors April 25, 2023 20:53
@hfhbd hfhbd force-pushed the hfhbd/r2dbc-async branch from 6d687f0 to deabd85 Compare April 25, 2023 20:53
@hfhbd hfhbd changed the base branch from derekellis/2023-04-25/async-cursors to master April 25, 2023 20:53
@hfhbd hfhbd changed the title Improved R2DBC async cursor Improve R2DBC async cursor Apr 25, 2023
@AlecKazakova AlecKazakova changed the base branch from master to derekellis/2023-04-25/async-cursors April 25, 2023 23:38
@AlecKazakova
Copy link
Collaborator

changed the base so its easier to look at

Base automatically changed from derekellis/2023-04-25/async-cursors to master April 25, 2023 23:42
@hfhbd hfhbd force-pushed the hfhbd/r2dbc-async branch from 1505b08 to 8f437ae Compare May 1, 2023 19:08
@hfhbd
Copy link
Collaborator Author

hfhbd commented May 2, 2023

I didn't find a better implementation except implementing a blocking subscriber by ourselves. While a blocking subscriber would conform to the specs, it is basically against the idea of reactive and non-blocking.

@hfhbd hfhbd closed this May 2, 2023
@hfhbd hfhbd deleted the hfhbd/r2dbc-async branch May 2, 2023 18:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants