Skip to content

chore: address commit comment #5451

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 2, 2025
Merged

Conversation

hrshya
Copy link
Contributor

@hrshya hrshya commented Feb 25, 2025


type: pre_push_report
description: Results of running various checks prior to pushing changes. report:

  • task: run_javascript_examples status: na
  • task: run_c_examples status: na
  • task: run_cpp_examples status: na
  • task: run_javascript_readme_examples status: na
  • task: run_c_benchmarks status: na
  • task: run_cpp_benchmarks status: na
  • task: run_fortran_benchmarks status: na
  • task: run_javascript_benchmarks status: na
  • task: run_julia_benchmarks status: na
  • task: run_python_benchmarks status: na
  • task: run_r_benchmarks status: na
  • task: run_javascript_tests status: na ---

Resolves #5426 .

Description

What is the purpose of this pull request?

This pull request:

Related Issues

Does this pull request have any related issues?

This pull request:

  • resolves no related issues.

Questions

Any questions for reviewers of this pull request?

No.

Other

Any other information relevant to this pull request? This may include screenshots, references, and/or implementation notes.

No.

Checklist

Please ensure the following tasks are completed before submitting this pull request.


@stdlib-js/reviewers

---
type: pre_push_report
description: Results of running various checks prior to pushing changes.
report:
  - task: run_javascript_examples
    status: na
  - task: run_c_examples
    status: na
  - task: run_cpp_examples
    status: na
  - task: run_javascript_readme_examples
    status: na
  - task: run_c_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_cpp_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_fortran_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_javascript_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_julia_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_python_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_r_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_javascript_tests
    status: na
---
@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot added Statistics Issue or pull request related to statistical functionality. Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. labels Feb 25, 2025
@stdlib-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Coverage Report

Package Statements Branches Functions Lines
stats/base/dists/gumbel/cdf $\color{green}293/293$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}19/19$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}4/4$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}293/293$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$

The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR.

@Planeshifter Planeshifter added the Ready To Merge A pull request which is ready to be merged. label Apr 2, 2025
@stdlib-bot
Copy link
Contributor

PR Commit Message

chore: address commit comment

PR-URL: https://github.com/stdlib-js/stdlib/pull/5451
Closes: https://github.com/stdlib-js/stdlib/issues/5426

Co-authored-by: hrshya <harshyadav6078@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Philipp Burckhardt <pburckhardt@outlook.com>

Please review the above commit message and make any necessary adjustments.

@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot removed the Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. label Apr 2, 2025
@Planeshifter Planeshifter merged commit 78dc663 into stdlib-js:develop Apr 2, 2025
59 checks passed
@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot added the Good First PR A pull request resolving a Good First Issue. label Apr 2, 2025
@hrshya hrshya deleted the fix/cdf branch April 10, 2025 12:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Good First PR A pull request resolving a Good First Issue. Ready To Merge A pull request which is ready to be merged. Statistics Issue or pull request related to statistical functionality.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Address commit comments (commit 8d999ed)
3 participants