Skip to content

docs: replace manual for loop in examples #6793

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 23, 2025

Conversation

hrshya
Copy link
Contributor

@hrshya hrshya commented Apr 23, 2025

Resolves none .

Description

What is the purpose of this pull request?

This pull request:

  • replaces manual for loop in examples for stats/base/dists/beta/mgf, stats/base/dists/beta/mode, stats/base/dists/beta/pdf, stats/base/dists/beta/quantile, stats/base/dists/beta/skewness, stats/base/dists/beta/stdev and stats/base/dists/beta/variance packages.

Related Issues

Does this pull request have any related issues?

This pull request:

  • resolves no related issues.

Questions

Any questions for reviewers of this pull request?

No.

Other

Any other information relevant to this pull request? This may include screenshots, references, and/or implementation notes.

No.

Checklist

Please ensure the following tasks are completed before submitting this pull request.


@stdlib-js/reviewers

@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot added Statistics Issue or pull request related to statistical functionality. Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. labels Apr 23, 2025
@stdlib-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Coverage Report

Package Statements Branches Functions Lines
stats/base/dists/beta/mgf $\color{green}321/321$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}22/22$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}4/4$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}321/321$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
stats/base/dists/beta/mode $\color{green}182/182$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}8/8$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}2/2$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}182/182$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
stats/base/dists/beta/pdf $\color{green}387/387$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}47/47$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}4/4$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}387/387$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
stats/base/dists/beta/quantile $\color{green}234/234$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}23/23$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}3/3$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}234/234$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
stats/base/dists/beta/skewness $\color{green}195/195$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}8/8$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}2/2$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}195/195$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
stats/base/dists/beta/stdev $\color{green}195/195$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}8/8$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}2/2$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}195/195$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
stats/base/dists/beta/variance $\color{green}190/190$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}8/8$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}2/2$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}190/190$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$

The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR.

@Planeshifter Planeshifter added the Ready To Merge A pull request which is ready to be merged. label Apr 23, 2025
@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot removed the Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. label Apr 23, 2025
@stdlib-bot
Copy link
Contributor

PR Commit Message

docs: replace manual `for` loop in examples

PR-URL: https://github.com/stdlib-js/stdlib/pull/6793

Co-authored-by: hrshya <harshyadav6078@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Philipp Burckhardt <pburckhardt@outlook.com>

Please review the above commit message and make any necessary adjustments.

@Planeshifter Planeshifter merged commit b7ca1bd into stdlib-js:develop Apr 23, 2025
66 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Ready To Merge A pull request which is ready to be merged. Statistics Issue or pull request related to statistical functionality.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants