You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm creating a new variant for the NUCLEO-F030R8. When using the massStoraryCopy build, platform.txt uses the {node} parameter of the board to decide where to copy the bin file at upload time. This fails for me when I follow the scheme used by all the other board.txt entries.
On my 64 bit linux 16.04, my NUCLEO-F030R8 board shows up with the name mass storage name of "NUCLEO" instead of "NODE_F030R8".
I tried running Win7 in a VM and it also shows up as "NUCLEO" there.
Is there an expected driver or udev entry I'm supposed to be using? Or should the my board entry look like this:
As I have mentioned in other thread.
The mount point of my F030R8 is: /dev/sdc on /media/<login>/NODE_F030R8 type vfat (rw,nosuid,nodev,uid=xxxxxx,gid=xxxxxx,shortname=mixed,dmask=0077,utf8=1,showexec,flush,uhelper=udisks2)
I'm creating a new variant for the NUCLEO-F030R8. When using the massStoraryCopy build, platform.txt uses the {node} parameter of the board to decide where to copy the bin file at upload time. This fails for me when I follow the scheme used by all the other board.txt entries.
On my 64 bit linux 16.04, my NUCLEO-F030R8 board shows up with the name mass storage name of "NUCLEO" instead of "NODE_F030R8".
I tried running Win7 in a VM and it also shows up as "NUCLEO" there.
Is there an expected driver or udev entry I'm supposed to be using? Or should the my board entry look like this:
BTW: that works properly
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: