Skip to content

Class Valid Constraint can't be used on a Form Type #10495

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
carlwitt opened this issue Mar 19, 2014 · 7 comments
Closed

Class Valid Constraint can't be used on a Form Type #10495

carlwitt opened this issue Mar 19, 2014 · 7 comments

Comments

@carlwitt
Copy link

I tried to ensure the validity of an embedded object via a form type by adding a valid constraint.

public function buildForm(FormBuilderInterface $builder, array $options)
{
    $builder->add('publication', new PublicationType(), array(
        'constraints' => array(new \Symfony\Component\Validator\Constraints\Valid())
    ));
}

The problem is that the ConstraintValidatorFactory can't check the constraint on form submission because it tries to instantiate a ValidValidator which doesn't exist.

I'm not sure whether a ValidValidator class is nonsense(1) (as far as I see, the *Validator classes are responsible for the actual validation) but it would be nice to be able to define the valid validation rule in that context, too.

(1) I thought about writing one, but I'm not sure whether there's a single source to retrieve the constraints from. As far as I see, there's at least the validation.yml, annotations in the classes and maybe even constraints defined in the form types.

array (size=4)
  'type' => int 1
  'message' => string 'Class 'Symfony\Component\Validator\Constraints\ValidValidator' not found' (length=72)
  'file' => string '/Users/macbookdata/NetBeansProjects/DTAMetadata/vendor/symfony/symfony/src/Symfony/Bundle/FrameworkBundle/Validator/ConstraintValidatorFactory.php' (length=146)
  'line' => int 71
@webmozart
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for the report! Currently, the Valid constraint cannot be used here. What exactly are you trying to do?

If you just want to make sure that the object stored in the publication is valid, you have two options:

  • put the Valid constraint on the $publication property in the domain model
  • enable the option "cascade_validation" for the field

Tell me if this solves your problem.

However, I'd like to keep this ticket open, because I think that passing Valid to the "constraints" option is much nicer than using a dedicated option ("cascade_validation"). I'll check whether we can do this change when #10287 is merged.

@carlwitt
Copy link
Author

  • @Assert\Valid in a model class works, but I have to expose protected inherited attributes. Im my case, propel ORM classes inherit from an automatically generated base class so I'd like to validate via getters not via the protected properties (e.g. $collTitleFragments and $collTitleFragmentsPartial)
  • cascade_validation kind of works, too, but the drawback is that it won't take into account rules I've defined in validation.yml. It rather seems as if only constraints that have been added to other form types are validated this way. This seems a bit inconsistent.

My solution here was to specify all validation rules in Resources/config/validation.yml and to use a different validation target (getters instead of properties).
Actually pretty simple, but I didn't knew and didn't instantly guess this option existed.

@webmozart
Copy link
Contributor

cascade_validation kind of works, too, but the drawback is that it won't take into account rules I've defined in validation.yml.

Really? This is weird, it should.

@carlwitt
Copy link
Author

In my case, cascade_validation as used in

// BookType.php
public function buildForm(FormBuilderInterface $builder, array $options)
{
    $builder->add('publication', new PublicationType(), array(
        'cascade_validation' => true,
    ));
}

won't throw the errors that should be thrown according to the following validation.yml

# Resources/config/validation.yml
DTA\MetadataBundle\Model\Data\Publication:
    getters:
        numpagesnumeric:
            - Range: 
                min: 1
                minMessage: "Wenn keine Seitenzahl bekannt ist, bitte leerlassen."

But it does throw the errors when defined as constraint in the form type like so:

// PublicationType.php
public function buildForm(FormBuilderInterface $builder, array $options)
{
    $builder->add('numpagesnumeric', null, array(
        'constraints' => array(
            new \Symfony\Component\Validator\Constraints\Range(array('min'=>1, 'minMessage'=>'...'))
        )
    ));

@stloyd
Copy link
Contributor

stloyd commented Mar 20, 2014

Shouldn't this be:

# Resources/config/validation.yml
DTA\MetadataBundle\Model\Data\Publication:
    properties:
        numpagesnumeric:
            - Range: 
                min: 1
                minMessage: "Wenn keine Seitenzahl bekannt ist, bitte leerlassen."

@carlwitt
Copy link
Author

I think both is possible, although I'm not exactly sure about case sensitiveness.
Using the getters validation target works with pure yaml validation however, so I don't think it has something to do with it.

fabpot added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 31, 2014
…mozart)

This PR was merged into the 2.5-dev branch.

Discussion
----------

[WIP][Validator] New NodeTraverser implementation

| Q             | A
| ------------- | ---
| Bug fix?      | yes
| New feature?  | yes
| BC breaks?    | no
| Deprecations? | yes
| Tests pass?   | yes
| Fixed tickets | TODO
| License       | MIT
| Doc PR        | TODO

This PR is ready for review.

#### Todo

- [x] Test extensively to avoid regressions
- [x] Test more extensively
- [x] Finish inline documentation
- [x] Provide a layer to choose the desired API through ValidatorBuilder
- [x] Provide a layer to choose the desired API through FrameworkBundle
- [x] Update UPGRADE file
- [x] Update CHANGELOG
- [ ] Update user documentation

#### Goal

The goal of this PR is to be able to fix the following tickets:

- [x] #6138 Simplify adding of constraint violations
- [x] #7146 Support group sequences in Validator API
- [x] #7432 Poorly implemented Visitor Pattern
- [x] #8617 Control traversal on class level
- [x] #9888 Improve support for collection validation (PR: #9988)

The following tickets are probably fixed, but require testing first:

- [ ] #8376 Using validation_group causes error message to display multiple times
- [ ] #9939 GroupSequences still execute next group if first fail

Of course, full backwards compatibility **must** be guaranteed.

Other tickets I want to fix in follow-up PRs:

* #3622 Constraints\Valid does not respect "groups" option
* #4453 walk constraints by groups
* #7700 Propagate implicit group names in constraints
* #9051 Always ask value event if field isn't in the validating group
* #10163 poor collection validation test coverage
* #10221 TypeValidator does not enforce desired type when value is NULL
* #10495 Class Valid Constraint can't be used on a Form Type

#### In a nutshell

The implementation removes the Visitor pattern, which was implemented badly. I tried fixing it via a NodeTraverser/NodeVisitor implementation, but performance degraded too much so I decided to remove the pattern altogether.

A couple of new features and bug fixes are possible thanks to the new implementation. See below for details.

#### PHP Versions

PHP 5.3.8 and older does not allow to implement two different interfaces which both contain a method with the same name. This is used in the compatibility layer that supports both the old and the new API.

For this reason, the compatibility layer is disabled on PHP < 5.3.9. Older PHP versions need to decide on the old API or the new API (without compatibility layer).

#### Choosing the API Version

The API version can be specified by one of `Validation::API_VERSION_2_4`, `Validation::API_VERSION_2_5` and `Validation::API_VERSION_2_5_BC` to `setApiVersion()` when building the validator:

```php
// Old implementation
$validator = Validation::createValidatorBuilder()
    ->setApiVersion(Validation::API_VERSION_2_4)
    ->getValidator();

// New implementation with BC API
// Does not work on PHP < 5.3.9
$validator = Validation::createValidatorBuilder()
    ->setApiVersion(Validation::API_VERSION_2_5)
    ->getValidator();

// New implementation without BC API
$validator = Validation::createValidatorBuilder()
    ->setApiVersion(Validation::API_VERSION_2_5_BC)
    ->getValidator();
```

#### Features

##### Constraint validation as first-class citizen

The new API merges `validateValue()` and `validate()`. The idea is that the validation of values against constraints should be as simple as possible. Object validation is a special case where an object is tested against the `Valid` constraint. A backwards compatibility layer is provided to use both `validate()` and `validateValue()` with the old signature.

```php
// Validate against explicit constraints
$violations = $validator->validate($firstName, array(
    new NotNull(),
    new Length(array('min' => 3)),
));

// Validate against metadata
$violations = $validator->validate($object);

// Same, more expressive notation
$violations = $validator->validate($object, new Valid());

// Validate each entry against its metadata
$violations = $validator->validate($array);
```

##### Aggregate violations

It is now possible to call the methods of the validator multiple times and aggregate the violations to a common violation list. To do so, call `startContext()`, execute the calls and call `getViolations()` in the end to retrieve the violations:

```php
$violations = $validator->startContext()
    ->validate($title, new NotNull())
    ->validate($text, new NotNull())
    ->validate($author->getName(), new NotNull())
    ->getViolations()
```

Most of the time, you will want to specify a property path for each validation. Use the method `atPath()` for that:

```php
$violations = $validator->startContext()
    ->atPath('title')->validate($title, new NotNull())
    ->atPath('text')->validate($text, new NotNull())
    ->atPath('author.name')->validate($author->getName(), new NotNull())
    ->getViolations()
```

##### Control the context of nested validations

In Symfony <= 2.4, you can validate objects or constraints from within a constraint validator like this:

```php
$this->context->validate($object);
$this->context->validateValue($value, new Length(array('min' => 3)));
```

The validations will run and all violations will be added to the current context.

This way, it is impossible though to validate something, inspect the result and then decide what kind of violations to add to the context. This is needed, for example, for the `Some` constraint (proposed in #9888), which should succeed if any of the validated values did *not* generate violations.

For this reason, the new context API features a method `getValidator()`. This method returns the validator instance, you can use it to validate anything in a new context (as the validator always does):

```php
$validator = $this->context->getValidator();
$violations = $validator->validate($object);

if (count($violations)  > 0) {
    $this->context->addViolation('The validation did not pass');
}
```

You can also explicitly start a new context:

```php
$validator = $this->context->getValidator();
$violations = $validator->startContext()
    ->atPath('title')->validate($title, new NotNull())
    ->atPath('text')->validate($text, new NotNull())
    ->getViolations()
```

If you want to execute the validation in the current context, use the `inContext()` method of the validator instead:

```php
// violations are added to $this->context
$validator->inContext($this->context)
    ->atPath('title')->validate($title, new NotNull())
    ->atPath('text')->validate($text, new NotNull())
;
```

With this feature, #9888 (especially the PR for it: #9988) can be finished.

##### Custom group sequences (#7146)

It is now possible to pass `GroupSequence` instances whenever you can pass a group to the validator. For example:

```php
$violations = $validator->validate($object, new Valid(), new GroupSequence('Basic', 'Strict'));
```

Or in the context of the Form component:

```php
$form = $this->createForm(new BlogType(), new Blog(), array(
    'validation_groups' => new GroupSequence('Basic', 'Strict'),
));
```

##### Constraint violation builders (#6138)

The API for adding constraint violations was simplified:

```php
$this->context->addViolation('message', array('param' => 'value'));

// or

$this->context->buildViolation('message')
    ->atPath('property')
    ->setParameter('param', 'value')
    ->setTranslationDomain('validation_strict')
    ->addViolation();
```

##### Control traversal at class level (#8617)

Currently, it is possible whether to traverse a `Traversable` object or not in the `Valid` constraint:

```php
/**
 * @Assert\Valid(traverse=true)
 */
private $tags = new TagList();
```

(actually, `true` is the default)

In this way, the validator will iterate the `TagList` instance and validate each of the contained objects. You can also set "traverse" to `false` to disable iteration.

What if you want to specify, that `TagList` instances should always (or never) be traversed? That's currently not possible.

With this PR, you can do the following:

```php
/**
 * @Assert\Traverse(false)
 */
class TagList implements \IteratorAggregate
{
    // ...
}
```

#### Follow-up features

Features of the follow-up PRs will be described directly there.

#### Backwards compatibility

I implemented a new `AbstractValidatorTest` which tests both the old and the new implementation for compatibility. I still want to extend this test to make sure we don't introduce any regressions.

Almost none of the existing classes were modified (or only slightly). If users depend on the current (now "legacy") implementation, they will have the choice to continue using it until 3.0 (of course, without the new features).

#### Your task

Congrats, you made it till here :) If you have time, please skim over the code and give me feedback on the overall implementation and the class/method names. Again, no feedback on details yet, there are quite a few areas in the code that are still work in progress.

Thanks,
Bernhard

[1] That means that only the nodes from the root of the graph until the currently validated node are held in memory.

Commits
-------

ca6a722 [Validator] Converted `@deprecate` doc comment into regular doc comment
68d8018 [Validator] Documented changes in the UPGRADE files
b1badea [Validator] Fixed failing CsrfFormLoginTest
0bfde4a [Validator] Fixed misnamed method calls in FrameworkExtension
3dc2b4d [Validator] Made "symfony/property-access" an optional dependency
c5629bb [Validator] Added getObject() to ExecutionContextInterface
9b204c9 [FrameworkBundle] Implemented configuration to select the desired Validator API
0946dbe [Validator] Adapted CHANGELOG
1b111d0 [Validator] Fixed typos pointed out by @cordoval
7bc952d [Validator] Improved inline documentation of RecursiveContextualValidator
166d71a [Validator] Removed unused property
90c27bb [Validator] Removed traverser implementation
3183aed [Validator] Improved performance of cache key generation
029a716 [Validator] Moved logic of replaceDefaultGroup() to validateNode()
2f23d97 [Validator] Reduced number of method calls on the execution context
73c9cc5 [Validator] Optimized performance by calling spl_object_hash() only once per object
94ef21e [Validator] Optimized use statements
1622eb3 [Validator] Fixed reference to removed class in ValidatorBuilder
be508e0 [Validator] Merged DefaultGroupReplacingVisitor and ContextUpdateVisitor into NodeValidationVisitor
50bb84d [Validator] Optimized RecursiveContextualValidator
eed29d8 [Validator] Improved performance of *ContextualValidator::validate()
5c479d8 [Validator] Simplified validateNodeForGroup
eeed509 [Validator] Improved phpdoc of RecursiveValidator
274d4e6 [Validator] Changed ValidatorBuilder to always use LegacyExecutionContext
38e26fb [Validator] Decoupled RecursiveContextualValidator from Node
23534ca [Validator] Added a recursive clone of the new implementation for speed comparison
f61d31e [Validator] Fixed grammar
886e05e [Validator] Removed unused use statement
93fdff7 [Validator] The supported API versions can now be passed to the ValidatorBuilder
987313d [Validator] Improved inline documentation of the violation builder
79387a7 [Validator] Improved inline documentation of the metadata classes
01ceeda [Validator] Improved test coverage of the Traverse constraint
9ca61df [Validator] Improved inline documentation of CascadingStrategy and TraversalStrategy
524a953 [Validator] Improved inline documentation of the validators
9986f03 [Validator] Added inline documentation for the PropertyPath utility class
be7f055 [Validator] Visitors may now abort the traversal by returning false from beforeTraversal()
299c2dc [Validator] Improved test coverage and prevented duplicate validation of constraints
186c115 [Validator] Improved test coverage of NonRecursiveNodeTraverser
822fe47 [Validator] Completed inline documentation of the Node classes and the NodeTraverser
dbce5a2 [Validator] Updated outdated doc blocks
8558377 [Validator] Added deprecation notes
e8fa15b [Validator] Fixed the new validator API under PHP < 5.3.9
2936d10 [Validator] Removed unused use statement
6fc6ecd [Validator] Fixed tests under PHP<5.3.9
778ec24 [Validator] Removed helper class Traversal
76d8c9a [Validator] Fixed typos
4161371 [Validator] Removed unused use statements
aeb6822 [Validator] Improved visitor names
08172bf [Validator] Merged validate(), validateObject() and validateObjects() to simplify usage
51197f6 [Validator] Made traversal of Traversables consistent
117b1b9 [Validator] Wrapped collections into CollectionNode instances
94583a9 [Validator] Changed NodeTraverser to traverse nodes iteratively, not recursively
cf1281f [Validator] Added "Visitor" suffix to all node visitors
230f2a7 [Validator] Fixed exception message
e057b19 [Validator] Decoupled ContextRefresher from ExecutionContext
e440690 [Validator] Renamed validateCollection() to validateObjects()
df41974 [Validator] Changed context manager to context factory
26eafa4 [Validator] Removed unused use statements
bc29591 [Validator] Clearly separated classes supporting the API <2.5/2.5+
a3555fb [Validator] Fixed: Objects are not traversed unless they are instances of Traversable
2c65a28 [Validator] Completed test coverage and documentation of the Node classes
9c9e715 [Validator] Completed documentation of GroupManagerInterface
1e81f3b [Validator] Finished test coverage and documentation of ExecutionContextManager
feb3d6f [Validator] Tested the validation in a separate context
718601c [Validator] Changed validateValue() to validate() in the new API
ee1adad [Validator] Implemented handling of arrays and Traversables in LegacyExecutionContext::validate()
09f744b [Validator] Implemented BC traversal of traversables through validate()
297ba4f [Validator] Added a note why scalars are passed to cascadeObject() in NodeTraverser
9b07b0c [Validator] Implemented BC validation of arrays through validate()
405a03b [Validator] Updated deprecation notes in GroupSequence
499b2bb [Validator] Completed test coverage of ExecutionContext
adc1437 [Validator] Fixed failing tests
4ea3ff6 [Validator] Finished inline documentation of ExecutionContext[Interface]
f6b7288 [Validator] Removed unused use statement
8318286 [Validator] Completed GroupSequence implementation
5fbf848 [Validator] Added note about Callback constraint to CHANGELOG
c1b1e03 [Validator] Added TODO reminder
8ae68c9 [Validator] Made tests green (yay!)
680f1ee [Validator] Renamed $params to $parameters
321d5bb [Validator] Throw exception if ObjectInitializer is constructed without visitors
1156bde [Validator] Extracted code for group sequence resolving into GroupSequenceResolver
b1a9477 [Validator] Added ObjectInitializer visitor
7e3a41d [Validator] Moved visitors to NodeVisitor namespace
a40189c [Validator] Decoupled the new classes a bit
a6ed4ca [Validator] Prototype of the traverser implementation
25cdc68 [Validator] Refactored ValidatorTest and ValidationVisitorTest into an abstract validator test class
@webmozart
Copy link
Contributor

This is possible since #10287.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants