Skip to content

Unify the way to provide expression functions for the DI container #13013

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 17, 2014

Conversation

stof
Copy link
Member

@stof stof commented Dec 17, 2014

Q A
Bug fix? yes
New feature? no
BC breaks? no
Deprecations? yes
Tests pass? yes
Fixed tickets #13012
License MIT
Doc PR n/a

Function providers registered on the ContainerBuilder are now reused by the PhpDumper when dumping the container instead of forcing to register them again.
I consider it as a bugfix, because the hook introduced in 2.6 is currently unusable.

Function providers registered on the ContainerBuilder are now reused by
the PhpDumper when dumping the container instead of forcing to register
them again.
Closes symfony#13012
@fabpot
Copy link
Member

fabpot commented Dec 17, 2014

Thank you @stof.

@fabpot fabpot merged commit 8425e4d into symfony:2.6 Dec 17, 2014
fabpot added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 17, 2014
…ontainer (stof)

This PR was merged into the 2.6 branch.

Discussion
----------

Unify the way to provide expression functions for the DI container

| Q             | A
| ------------- | ---
| Bug fix?      | yes
| New feature?  | no
| BC breaks?    | no
| Deprecations? | yes
| Tests pass?   | yes
| Fixed tickets | #13012
| License       | MIT
| Doc PR        | n/a

Function providers registered on the ContainerBuilder are now reused by the PhpDumper when dumping the container instead of forcing to register them again.
I consider it as a bugfix, because the hook introduced in 2.6 is currently unusable.

Commits
-------

8425e4d Unify the way to provide expression functions for the DI container
@stof stof deleted the expression_language_di branch December 18, 2014 08:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants