Skip to content

[Cache] Add CacheItem::getPreviousTags() #20851

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 22, 2017

Conversation

nicolas-grekas
Copy link
Member

Q A
Branch? master
Bug fix? no
New feature? yes
BC breaks? no
Deprecations? no
Tests pass? yes
Fixed tickets -
License MIT
Doc PR -

As discussed in #19728

@nicolas-grekas nicolas-grekas added this to the 3.3 milestone Dec 9, 2016
@nicolas-grekas nicolas-grekas changed the title [Cache] Add CacheItem::getTags() [Cache] Add CacheItem::getPreviousTags() Dec 29, 2016
@nicolas-grekas nicolas-grekas force-pushed the cache-get-tags branch 2 times, most recently from 8a1cab4 to 9bea729 Compare December 29, 2016 14:28
@nicolas-grekas
Copy link
Member Author

Updated according to latest feedback in #19728

@nicolas-grekas
Copy link
Member Author

Now that the tag-interop repo is ready, I think we can merge this one as experimental.
Status: needs review

@fabpot
Copy link
Member

fabpot commented Mar 22, 2017

Thank you @nicolas-grekas.

@fabpot fabpot merged commit da35466 into symfony:master Mar 22, 2017
fabpot added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 22, 2017
This PR was merged into the 3.3-dev branch.

Discussion
----------

[Cache] Add CacheItem::getPreviousTags()

| Q             | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch?       | master
| Bug fix?      | no
| New feature?  | yes
| BC breaks?    | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass?   | yes
| Fixed tickets | -
| License       | MIT
| Doc PR        | -

As discussed in #19728

Commits
-------

da35466 [Cache] Add CacheItem::getPreviousTags()
@nicolas-grekas nicolas-grekas deleted the cache-get-tags branch March 22, 2017 22:37
@fabpot fabpot mentioned this pull request May 1, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants