-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.6k
[DI] Remove experimental status from service-locator argument type #21766
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
fabpot
merged 1 commit into
symfony:master
from
chalasr:servicelocator-nomore-experimental
Feb 26, 2017
Merged
[DI] Remove experimental status from service-locator argument type #21766
fabpot
merged 1 commit into
symfony:master
from
chalasr:servicelocator-nomore-experimental
Feb 26, 2017
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
dad7618
to
46dc47a
Compare
nicolas-grekas
approved these changes
Feb 26, 2017
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍
ogizanagi
approved these changes
Feb 26, 2017
dunglas
approved these changes
Feb 26, 2017
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍
xabbuh
approved these changes
Feb 26, 2017
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍
Thank you @chalasr. |
fabpot
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 26, 2017
…ument type (chalasr) This PR was merged into the 3.3-dev branch. Discussion ---------- [DI] Remove experimental status from service-locator argument type | Q | A | ------------- | --- | Branch? | master | Bug fix? | no | New feature? | no | BC breaks? | no | Deprecations? | no | Tests pass? | yes | Fixed tickets | #21625 (comment), #21625 (comment), #21710 | License | MIT The `service-locator` argument type is not controversial to me. We know its scope, nothing really surprising, just a map of services to be lazily loaded like `iterator` is (which is not experimental) but keyed. About its api, it's just PSR-11 restricted to objects, nothing that can't be changed safely in the future. As stated in #21625 (comment), it proven its usefulness already. I think what we were looking for by flagging it experimental is just to see it in action, we've 3 opened PRs for that (#21625, #21690, #21730). This allows introducing deprecations for making use of the feature in the core, thus unlocks #21625 and #21690. Commits ------- 46dc47a [DI] Remove experimental status from service-locator argument type
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The
service-locator
argument type is not controversial to me. We know its scope, nothing really surprising, just a map of services to be lazily loaded likeiterator
is (which is not experimental) but keyed.About its api, it's just PSR-11 restricted to objects, nothing that can't be changed safely in the future.
As stated in #21625 (comment), it proven its usefulness already. I think what we were looking for by flagging it experimental is just to see it in action, we've 3 opened PRs for that (#21625, #21690, #21730).
This allows introducing deprecations for making use of the feature in the core, thus unlocks #21625 and #21690.