Skip to content

[Security] Fix wrong term in UserProviderInterface #23487

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

issei-m
Copy link
Contributor

@issei-m issei-m commented Jul 12, 2017

Q A
Branch? master
Bug fix? no
New feature? no
BC breaks? no
Deprecations? no
Tests pass? yes
Fixed tickets -
License MIT
Doc PR -

The term "account" is the just remnant from the days of AccountInterface, isn't it?

Copy link
Contributor

@ro0NL ro0NL left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can be patched against 2.7 👍

@xabbuh xabbuh added this to the 2.7 milestone Jul 15, 2017
@fabpot
Copy link
Member

fabpot commented Jul 17, 2017

Thank you @issei-m.

fabpot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 17, 2017
…i-m)

This PR was submitted for the master branch but it was merged into the 2.7 branch instead (closes #23487).

Discussion
----------

[Security] Fix wrong term in UserProviderInterface

| Q             | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch?       | master
| Bug fix?      | no
| New feature?  | no <!-- don't forget updating src/**/CHANGELOG.md files -->
| BC breaks?    | no
| Deprecations? | no <!-- don't forget updating UPGRADE-*.md files -->
| Tests pass?   | yes
| Fixed tickets | -
| License       | MIT
| Doc PR        | -

The term "account" is the just remnant from the days of AccountInterface, isn't it?

Commits
-------

b5b8c15 [Security] Fix wrong term in UserProviderInterface
@fabpot fabpot closed this Jul 17, 2017
@issei-m issei-m deleted the patch-1 branch July 17, 2017 11:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants