[RateLimiter] Fix sliding_window misbehaving with stale records #40141
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Currently the SlidingWindow RateLimiter returns a negative value for getHitCount if the previous SlidingWindow was too long ago. This results in a really high value from
SlidingWindowLimiter::getAvailableTokens()
which is higher than the configured limit.This limits the value of percentOfCurrentTimeframe in
SlidingWindow::getHitCount()
to 1 so it can't result in a negative hitcount.The 2nd fix fixes the SlidingWindow instance (essentially) not storing hits if the previous instance is way in the past, as the next instance will still be "in the past". This causes RateLimit to behave as if it were disabled until it has caught up again, which could take a long time when it is configured with a small window size.