Skip to content

[Validator] Add Conditionally constraint #44116

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

julienfalque
Copy link
Contributor

Q A
Branch? 5.4
Bug fix? no
New feature? yes
Deprecations? no
Tickets -
License MIT
Doc PR -

This PR adds a Conditionally constraint that allows validating a set of constraints when a condition is fulfilled.

@carsonbot
Copy link

Hey!

To help keep things organized, we don't allow "Draft" pull requests. Could you please click the "ready for review" button or close this PR and open a new one when you are done?

Note that a pull request does not have to be "perfect" or "ready for merge" when you first open it. We just want it to be ready for a first review.

Cheers!

Carsonbot

@julienfalque julienfalque marked this pull request as ready for review November 17, 2021 17:31
@carsonbot carsonbot added this to the 5.4 milestone Nov 17, 2021
@julienfalque julienfalque force-pushed the validation-conditionally-constraint branch from 81493b0 to ab58a4c Compare November 17, 2021 17:34
@noniagriconomie
Copy link
Contributor

noniagriconomie commented Nov 17, 2021

hi @julienfalque , this PR seems similar to this one isnt it?

(also v5.4 is freezed, target branch for feature should be v6.1 as to now :))

@chalasr chalasr modified the milestones: 5.4, 6.1 Nov 17, 2021
@julienfalque
Copy link
Contributor Author

@noniagriconomie You're right, I didn't know about #42593 and it seems more complete so let's close here. Thanks for the pointer!

@julienfalque julienfalque deleted the validation-conditionally-constraint branch November 18, 2021 08:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants