[FrameworkBundle] Lower JsonSerializableNormalizer priority #46668
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
IMHO, more generic normalizers, like
ObjectNormalizer
orJsonSerializableNormalizer
should have lower priority than other more specific normalizers, likeDateTimeNormalizer
,ConstraintViolationListNormalizer
, etc.My issue was with
Carbon
library, which extends php'sDateTime
.Carbon
classes implementJsonSerializable
interface, so they are serialized withJsonSerializableNormalizer
, using its internaltoJSON()
method, so I can't control which format I want them to be serialized.I should be able to do it, as I can with
DateTime
, cause both implementDateTimeInterface
.That's because
JsonSerializableNormalizer
has higher priority thanDateTimeNormalizer
.For now, my "fix" was to change priority in config like so: