[Validator] Add support for RFC4122 format in the Ulid constraint
#57938
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
9677b52 to
9382d71
Compare
9382d71 to
be4c7d7
Compare
|
Thank you @alexandre-daubois. |
nicolas-grekas
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 7, 2024
…d` constraint (alexandre-daubois) This PR was merged into the 7.2 branch. Discussion ---------- [Validator] Add support for RFC4122 format in the `Ulid` constraint | Q | A | ------------- | --- | Branch? | 7.2 | Bug fix? | no | New feature? | yes | Deprecations? | no | Issues | Fix #51540 | License | MIT Related to #57438 (comment). I did not add new line in the CHANGELOG intentionally, I think the one added in #57438 is enough. Commits ------- 9382d71 [Validator] Add support for RFC4122 format in the `Ulid` constraint
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Related to #57438 (comment). I did not add new line in the CHANGELOG intentionally, I think the one added in #57438 is enough.